1965
DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1965.17.1.224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Actuarial Description of Abnormal Personality in a Mental Hospital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1966
1966
1974
1974

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As in the earlier studies, a wide variety of nontest data were analyzed, and behaviors characteristic of the various profile types were listed in code books for use by practicing clinicians (Gilberstadt & Duker, 1965;Marks & Seeman, 1963). Although clinicians' reactions to this approach initially were quite positive, they have become less enchanted with the approach because experience has indicated that few profiles encountered in most clinical settings fit any code type presented in the code books (Fowler & Coyle, 1968a, 1968bHuff, 1965;Meikle & Gerritse, 1970;Pauker, 1966;Schultz, Gibeau, & Barry, 1968).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in the earlier studies, a wide variety of nontest data were analyzed, and behaviors characteristic of the various profile types were listed in code books for use by practicing clinicians (Gilberstadt & Duker, 1965;Marks & Seeman, 1963). Although clinicians' reactions to this approach initially were quite positive, they have become less enchanted with the approach because experience has indicated that few profiles encountered in most clinical settings fit any code type presented in the code books (Fowler & Coyle, 1968a, 1968bHuff, 1965;Meikle & Gerritse, 1970;Pauker, 1966;Schultz, Gibeau, & Barry, 1968).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportion of disagreements that occurred between the MS and the GD rules ( Table 3) was considerably lower for the "complete fit" profiles than for any of the rule relaxation procedures, x2,, 3 df, = 17.67, p < .001. There were no differences between the three relaxation methods in proportion of disagreements between systems.…”
Section: Profile Classificationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The overall elevation of the profile reported in the Atlas was much less than that of the hypothetical profile. The hypothetical profile is not easily classified within Marks and Seeman's (1963) system although this is, itself, no indictment of its typicalness (Huff, 1965). All of the promising diagnostic signs employed by Goldberg (1965) classify this profile as "psychotic."…”
Section: Implications For Clinical Interpretation Of the Mmpimentioning
confidence: 98%