2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.02.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of a Single-Item Screening Tool to Detect Clinically Significant Fatigue, Pain, Distress, and Anorexia in Ambulatory Cancer Practice

Abstract: Fatigue, pain, distress, and anorexia are four commonly encountered symptoms in cancer. To evaluate the usefulness of a single-item screening for these symptoms, 597 ambulatory outpatients with solid tumors were administered a self-report screening instrument within the first 12 weeks of chemotherapy. Patients rated the severity of each symptom on a 0-10 scale, at its worst over the past three days, with higher ratings associated with higher symptom levels. From this sample, 148 patients also completed a more … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
116
1
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
116
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Patient burden should be a consideration in determining the extent of testing that occurs in each session. An additional challenge exists for patients experiencing the fatigue associated with a cancer diagnosis and treatment (Butt et al, 2008). Several hours of testing may not be practical.…”
Section: Challenges With Neurocognitive Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient burden should be a consideration in determining the extent of testing that occurs in each session. An additional challenge exists for patients experiencing the fatigue associated with a cancer diagnosis and treatment (Butt et al, 2008). Several hours of testing may not be practical.…”
Section: Challenges With Neurocognitive Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…También este tipo de escalas de síntomas emocionales y físicos siguen la tendencia actual a una mayor brevedad, para ajustarse a la realidad asistencial, como ocurre en la desarrollada por Zeeshan Butt y colaboradores, en USA (118) en pacientes ambulatorios con cáncer, de sólo 4 ítems: 1 Fatiga, 2 Dolor, 3 Malestar emocional, y 4 Anorexia; y en otras más sencillas, como la escala visual analógica (EVA) desarrollada en nuestro medio por el grupo ASTHENOS (119) . Estos instrumentos breves de evaluación destacados no están exentos de dificultades, debidas al tipo de formato, a las mediciones usadas, al tiempo requerido para administrarlos, y a la dificultad de los médicos para su interpretación.…”
Section: Instrumentos De Detección Adecuados a La Realidad Asistencialunclassified
“…A cut-off of 4 or more out of 10 has been recommended for use as a screening tool for pain within ambulatory cancer patients 21 , and a cut-off of 7 or more was used to identify severe levels of pain.…”
Section: 23mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few studies have examined single-item screening tools for fatigue. One study reported a cut-off of 3 as optimal 22 ; another reported a cut-off of 5 21 . The U.S. National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends using a cut-off of 4 or more to identify cases of possible fatigue.…”
Section: 24mentioning
confidence: 99%