2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of a simplified sample processing step without RNA extraction for direct SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR detection

Abstract: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has resulted in significant shortages of RT-PCR testing supplies including RNA extraction kits. The goal of our study was to determine if a simplified heat-RNA release method would provide comparable detection of SARS-CoV-2 without the need for nucleic acid extraction. RT-PCR results using the ChromaCode HDPCR™ SARS-CoV-2 were compared using the heat-RNA release method and an automated RNA extraction system (EMAG). The heat-RNA release met… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(5 reference statements)
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Argentina, a trained lab technician processes approximately 24 samples every 1.5 hours. Additionally, the skyrocketing increment on the clinical use of RT-qPCR due to the COVID-19 pandemic led to a worldwide shortage of RNA purification reagents [4,5] thus, many research groups around the world have concentrated their efforts on either simplifying or eliminating the extraction step [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Argentina, a trained lab technician processes approximately 24 samples every 1.5 hours. Additionally, the skyrocketing increment on the clinical use of RT-qPCR due to the COVID-19 pandemic led to a worldwide shortage of RNA purification reagents [4,5] thus, many research groups around the world have concentrated their efforts on either simplifying or eliminating the extraction step [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lübke et al 3 showed with their protocol without extraction using the PrimeDirect TM Probe RT‐qPCR Mix (TaKara) that the SARS‐CoV‐2 detection was 82.4% with 16/91 negative samples characterized by low viral loads (Ct > 35). Barza et al, with their method using the ChromaCode HDPCR TM SARS‐CoV‐2 Research Use Only correctly identified 94% of the samples (81/86) with the same observations concerning the negative returned samples (Ct > 35) 8 . The extraction‐free strategy was also investigated with three other commercial kits showing 51% (37/73) positive detection with SARS‐CoV‐2 RdRp plus EAV control (Roche), 62% (48/77) with real‐time fluorescent RT‐qPCR kit for detecting 2019‐nCoV (BGI), and 45% (41/74) for Detection kit for 2019‐nCoV RNA (Sun Yat‐sen University) 9 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Various studies have already focused on extraction‐free protocols 3–10 . Lübke et al 3 showed with their protocol without extraction using the PrimeDirect TM Probe RT‐qPCR Mix (TaKara) that the SARS‐CoV‐2 detection was 82.4% with 16/91 negative samples characterized by low viral loads (Ct > 35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, the skyrocketing increment on the clinical use of RT-qPCR due to the COVID-19 pandemic led to a worldwide shortage of RNA purification reagents [4,5] thus, many research groups around the world have concentrated their efforts on either simplifying or eliminating the extraction step [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%