2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-8502(01)00048-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of a simple model for the interpretation of experimental data on particle resuspension in turbulent flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4. Schematic of particle-substrate contact for the dynamic re-suspension model (Biasi et al 2001). (Reeks and Hall 2001;Ibrahim et al 2003), and properties of the substrate (asperity distributions).…”
Section: Re-suspension Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…4. Schematic of particle-substrate contact for the dynamic re-suspension model (Biasi et al 2001). (Reeks and Hall 2001;Ibrahim et al 2003), and properties of the substrate (asperity distributions).…”
Section: Re-suspension Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers (Ziskind et al 1995) have attempted to explain particle re-suspension based on a force imbalance due to turbulent bursts. Other researchers (Reeks et al 1988;Biasi et al 2001;Reeks and Hall 2001;Ibrahim et al 2008) have argued that the moments induced on surface asperities (a) by instantaneous lift/drag forces (rolling mode) are a more probable mechanism for re-suspension, particularly the short-term variant.…”
Section: Re-suspension Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations