2000
DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/46.12.1956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of a Reference Material Proposed by the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine to Evaluate Analytical Methods for the Determination of Plasma Lipoprotein(a)

Abstract: Background: As part of the NIH/National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Contract for the Standardization of Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] Measurements, a study was performed in collaboration with the IFCC Working Group for the Standardization of Lp(a) Assays. The aims of the study, performed with the participation of 16 manufacturers and 6 research laboratories, were to evaluate the IFCC proposed reference material (PRM) for its ability to transfer an accuracy-based value to the immunoassay calibrators and to assess … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
97
1
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 262 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
97
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A normal value for plasma concentration has not been agreed upon: some authors consider this to be up to 20 mg dL − 1 [16] and others up to 30 mg dL − 1 [17], pointing out that the use of different monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies generates differences in results [18]. In order to assess concordance in results among different methods, a calibrator and a reference ELISA method have been evaluated and demonstrated to be insensitive to apo(a) isoform-size heterogeneity [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A normal value for plasma concentration has not been agreed upon: some authors consider this to be up to 20 mg dL − 1 [16] and others up to 30 mg dL − 1 [17], pointing out that the use of different monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies generates differences in results [18]. In order to assess concordance in results among different methods, a calibrator and a reference ELISA method have been evaluated and demonstrated to be insensitive to apo(a) isoform-size heterogeneity [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lp(a) measurement was performed in a core laboratory certified by the NHLBI/CDC Prevention Lipid Standardization Program. We used the only commercially available assay, not affected by Kringle IV-Type 2 repeats, as assessed by a NHLBI and International Federation of Clinical Chemistry standardization group [12]. The turbidimetric assay used reagents and calibrators from Denka Seiken (Niigata, Japan) on the Hitachi 917 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strengths of this study include its prospective nature and use of a reliable mass-based assay [12] to measure circulating levels of Lp(a). Some of the prior discrepant findings of studies regarding Lp(a) levels and VTE may be due in part to difficulty in measuring Lp(a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suitable protein-based assays for determination of APC-R [66,67], protein C, protein S and antithrombin activity, concentration of clottable fibrinogen, plasminogen activity, activities of coagulation factors VIIIC and XII, Lp(a) [68,69], histidine-rich glycoprotein, heparin cofactor II, and fasting homocysteine concentrations, should be investigated along with DNA-based assays, i. e. factor V G1691A mutation, prothrombin G20 210A variant and MTHFR C677T genotype.…”
Section: Screening For Risk Factors In Pediatric Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%