2012
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01355-12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of a Prequalification Panel for Rapid Scale-Up of High-Throughput HIV Viral Load Testing

Abstract: c Increased access to antiretroviral drugs expands needs for viral load (VL) testing. South Africa's National Health Laboratory Service responded to demands by implementing two testing platforms in 17 laboratories within 8 months. An industry partner's collaboration, training programs, and method verification with a VL prequalification panel ensured testing quality and rapid implementation.M ore than 1.4 million patients receive antiretroviral (ARV) treatment in South Africa through the public health services … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To verify the Xpert HIV-1 VL assay (referred to as Xpert VL) as ‘fit-for-purpose’ prior to clinical specimen testing, a standardised, 42 member, frozen, subtype-C plasma panel (termed the South African Viral Quality Assessment–SAVQA) [11], was included in the evaluation. The SAVQA panel consisted of 22 HIV-negative specimens and 20 HIV-positive specimens ranging from 750 to 21000cp/ml (2-4log cp/ml) and is designed to measure accuracy and precision.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To verify the Xpert HIV-1 VL assay (referred to as Xpert VL) as ‘fit-for-purpose’ prior to clinical specimen testing, a standardised, 42 member, frozen, subtype-C plasma panel (termed the South African Viral Quality Assessment–SAVQA) [11], was included in the evaluation. The SAVQA panel consisted of 22 HIV-negative specimens and 20 HIV-positive specimens ranging from 750 to 21000cp/ml (2-4log cp/ml) and is designed to measure accuracy and precision.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Levels of acceptable variability were determined as Յ0.19 standard deviation (SD) and Յ0.3 bias, as described previously (17,18).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Liat HIV Quant plasma assay demonstrated acceptable bias of Ͻ0.3 log copies/ml for the majority of VL values of Ͼ3.0 log copies/ml, with an overall acceptable percentage similarity CV of 2.7% compared to that of the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 assay and even better performance of 1.8% compared to that of Roche CAP/CTMv2. These are below the expected limit of 2.9% CV reported for the comparison between Roche CAP/CTMv2 and Abbott RealTime HIV-1 on the SAVQA panel (19). Twenty confirmed HIV-negative specimens all were reported as undetectable on both the Liat HIV Quant whole-blood and plasma assays.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Due to a limited number of Liat plasma cartridges available, 10 of 17 HIV-negative panel members were tested, and all (n ϭ 25) of the quantifiable panel members were tested on a Liat analyzer. The results generated by the Liat HIV Quant plasma assay were compared to published criteria (Ͻ35% coefficient of variation on untransformed data; Ͻ0.19 log copies/ml standard deviations [SD]; Ͻ0.3 log copies/ml bias; Ͻ2.9% similarity coefficient of variation [CV] [21]) determined previously for the Roche CAP/CTMv2 and Abbott HIV-1 RealTime HIV-1 platforms on this panel (19).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation