2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0732-8893(02)00366-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of a nested polymerase chain reaction (N-PCR) to detect Trypanosoma cruzi in blood samples from chronic chagasic patients and patients with doubtful serologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
55
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
55
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…30,31 Our results are consistent with those of a previous report that indicate that the sensitivity of the Tcz1/ Tcz2 PCR is approximately 10 times higher than that of the PCR using the kS35Ј/S36Ј primers, 6 despite the theoretically similar number of targets. Such results might be related to an incomplete dispersion of the dense kinetoplast minicircle present in the blood samples.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…30,31 Our results are consistent with those of a previous report that indicate that the sensitivity of the Tcz1/ Tcz2 PCR is approximately 10 times higher than that of the PCR using the kS35Ј/S36Ј primers, 6 despite the theoretically similar number of targets. Such results might be related to an incomplete dispersion of the dense kinetoplast minicircle present in the blood samples.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Although some authors have demonstrated that PCR is more sensitive than hemoculture and xenodiagnosis (6), its sensitivity is not 100% due to the fact that detecting a parasite in 10 ml of blood is slightly complicated in terms of steric hindrance and the availability of template DNA within the same reaction mixture. Some authors have also reported the possibility of using a nested PCR in order to increase the amount of parasite template DNA (22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NPCR -The NPCR was performed as previously described by our group (Marcon et al 2002) with some modifications. The first reaction was performed with 2 µL of the DNA sample, 50 mM of potassium chloride, 10 mM of Tris-HCl (pH 8.4), 2.5 mM magnesium chloride, 2.0 mM of each oligonucleotide (TCZ1 and TCZ2 -first reaction; TCZ3 and TCZ4 -second reaction) described in Table II, deoxyribonucleic mixture (1 mM) -dNTPs (dATP, dGTP, dCTP; dTTP) and 2.0 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen) in a final volume of 30 µL.…”
Section: Patients Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown that the detected DNA is derived from the persistence of the parasite in the affected tissues and not from DNA persistence over long periods of time. Piron et al (2007) used nested PCR (NPCR) and real-time techniques to detect and quantify T. cruzi in blood samples of chagasic patients, obtaining a similar positivity rate to results obtained by Marcon et al (2002). The real-time PCR technique was also employed to detect T. cruzi in the amniotic fluid of mothers with Chagas disease (Virreira et al 2006) and to subtype T. cruzi I and II in infected tissues by means of the difference in primer annealing temperatures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%