2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of a modified Furlow Z-plasty as a secondary cleft palate repair procedure to reduce velopharyngeal insufficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…65 Furlow palatoplasty has been shown to be an effective treatment for VPI following primary palate repair with velopharyngeal closure rates of 82 to 89% 56,66 and significant improvements in speech assessment scores. [66][67][68][69][70] Similar success has been reported with pharyngeal flaps and DSP. Successful correction of VPI with pharyngeal flaps and sphincter pharyngoplasty is reported to be between 74 to 89% and 72 to 85%, respectively.…”
Section: Surgical Planningmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…65 Furlow palatoplasty has been shown to be an effective treatment for VPI following primary palate repair with velopharyngeal closure rates of 82 to 89% 56,66 and significant improvements in speech assessment scores. [66][67][68][69][70] Similar success has been reported with pharyngeal flaps and DSP. Successful correction of VPI with pharyngeal flaps and sphincter pharyngoplasty is reported to be between 74 to 89% and 72 to 85%, respectively.…”
Section: Surgical Planningmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…There is also the possibility of needing a revision pharyngeal surgery (Por et al, 2010). In stark contrast, the Furlow procedure has been reported to be a reliable option for management of VPD, either as an isolated procedure, a “primer procedure,” or as an adjunct to a pharyngeal flap of some manner (Chen et al, 1994; Hudson et al, 1995; Perkins et al, 2005; Gosain and Arneja, 2007; Nayar et al, 2014; Chim et al, 2015; Pet et al, 2015; Reddy et al, 2016). When used as a stand-alone procedure, the morbidity is minimal to none (Chen et al, 1994; Perkins et al, 2005; Chim et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The operative technique included levator muscle repositioning using intravelar veloplasty or double opposing Z-plasty (Furlow) and posteriorly based buccinator myomucosal flaps for palatal lengthening (unilateral or bilateral) [6,7]. Briefly, one of two techniques were done for Levator muscle repositioning.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%