2011
DOI: 10.3171/2011.2.peds10515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of a minimally invasive tubular retraction system for deep-seated tumors in pediatric patients

Abstract: Object Microsurgical removal is the preferred treatment for most deep-seated, intraaxial tumors in the pediatric population. The feasibility of surgery as an option has improved with advances in surgical technology and technique. Tubular retractors disperse retraction forces over a greater surface area than do conventional retractors, which can lower the risk of ischemic complications. The authors describe their experience utilizing a new tubular retractor system spe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
55
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, planning the surgical corridor with DTI fiber tracking can minimize the risk of neurological deficits that are induced by trajectory injury. 10,19) Furthermore, linear cortical incision can reduce the risk of postoperative seizure, and use of a tubular retractor system also contributes to minimizing the cortical incision and reduces the risk of trajectory injury by distribution of forces on the surrounding white matter. 10,12,17,20) We used a ViewSite tubular retractor that was 17 mm in width and 7 cm in length.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, planning the surgical corridor with DTI fiber tracking can minimize the risk of neurological deficits that are induced by trajectory injury. 10,19) Furthermore, linear cortical incision can reduce the risk of postoperative seizure, and use of a tubular retractor system also contributes to minimizing the cortical incision and reduces the risk of trajectory injury by distribution of forces on the surrounding white matter. 10,12,17,20) We used a ViewSite tubular retractor that was 17 mm in width and 7 cm in length.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,19) Furthermore, linear cortical incision can reduce the risk of postoperative seizure, and use of a tubular retractor system also contributes to minimizing the cortical incision and reduces the risk of trajectory injury by distribution of forces on the surrounding white matter. 10,12,17,20) We used a ViewSite tubular retractor that was 17 mm in width and 7 cm in length. This retractor is made of transparent plastic and is available in four different widths (12 mm, 17 mm, 21 mm, and 28 mm) and three different lengths (3 cm, 5 cm, and 7 cm).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…27 The frequency of retraction-based injury has been estimated to be approximately 10% in skull base surgery and 5% in intracranial aneurysm operations. 4 Techniques such as intermittent retraction, 24 endonasal trajectories, 3,6,10,17 and those that use tubular retractors 1,2,7,9,[11][12][13][14][15][16][18][19][20][21][22][23]25 have been used to minimize these injuries.Previously, we reported the successful use of a METRx spinal tubular retractor system, paired with the Brainlab frameless navigation system, for resection of deep-seated intracranial lesions. 9 The advantages of this tubular retractor system include equal distribution of retraction pressure abbreviatioNs ADC = apparent diffusion coefficient; DWI = diffusion-weighted imaging; GTR = gross-total resection; NTR = near-total resection; STR = subtotal resection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%