2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-63930-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of a food neophobia test to characterize personality traits of dairy calves

Abstract: Food neophobia, i.e. the avoidance of novel foods, is common in ruminants and may provide a biologically relevant and practical way to test individual responses to novelty or challenge. We aimed to determine if behavioural responses in a food neophobia test (exposure to a novel total mixed ration) reflected boldness and exploratory personality traits derived from 3 traditional tests (open field, novel human and novel object) in dairy calves. We performed two Principal Component Analyses, one using behaviours f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, to engage with something unknown, an animal first needs to overcome potential fear of approaching novelty. However, boldness and neophobia do not necessarily correlate, indicating separate behavioral traits (Boogert et al, 2006; Carter et al, 2012; Costa et al, 2020; Ward‐Fear et al, 2018). Further, in the literature, the opposite of boldness is defined as shyness (Brown et al, 2005; Wilson et al, 1994) whilst the opposite of neophobia is referred to as neophilia and defined as an attraction toward novelty or even as a preference for novelty over familiarity (Biondi et al, 2020; Day et al, 2003; Greenberg and Mettke‐Hofmann 2001; Kaulfuß and Mills 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, to engage with something unknown, an animal first needs to overcome potential fear of approaching novelty. However, boldness and neophobia do not necessarily correlate, indicating separate behavioral traits (Boogert et al, 2006; Carter et al, 2012; Costa et al, 2020; Ward‐Fear et al, 2018). Further, in the literature, the opposite of boldness is defined as shyness (Brown et al, 2005; Wilson et al, 1994) whilst the opposite of neophobia is referred to as neophilia and defined as an attraction toward novelty or even as a preference for novelty over familiarity (Biondi et al, 2020; Day et al, 2003; Greenberg and Mettke‐Hofmann 2001; Kaulfuß and Mills 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to expectation, TMI was negatively associated with factor 3 ("active") measured in the traditional personality tests. In other studies, we observed that calves that were less active in novel environment, novel object, and novel person tests had increased consumption of novel feed (Costa et al, 2020), and that less active calves in these tests had improved feed efficiency (Neave et al, 2019). Future work should investigate how activity measured in different contexts has differing relationships with growth, feeding behavior, and nutrient utilization.…”
Section: Performance Of Dairy Calvesmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…We chose a correlational multivariate analysis approach (principal component analysis; PCA) to explore and extract common sets of behaviors across the different personality tests, following Costa et al (2020). The PCA included 9 input variables: time exploring environment, time touching, time attentive, time playing, time inactive, and latency to approach the object, person, closed umbrella and open umbrella after the startle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have also found positive associations with growth and feed intake (especially concentrate intake) in calves that were more exploratory (Neave et al, 2018(Neave et al, , 2019. Other studies found a relationship between exploration and willingness to try new feeds (Costa et al, 2014;Meagher et al, 2017;Costa et al, 2020). Willingness to try new feeds may allow animals to adjust their diet to reduce their risk of maladies and avoid satiety of a single food (Villalba et al, 2010), suggesting the value of exploration in feeding behaviors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%