1979
DOI: 10.1097/00006199-197905000-00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of a Decision Tree to Improve Accuracy of Diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Greenwood (1993) observes that the reality of patient care is made up of ‘messy, intermediate situations’ where the best outcomes may be dependent upon opinion, and the ranking of hypotheses may be difficult as well as being meaningless. On the other hand, Grier (1976) and Aspinall (1979) found that nurses using decision trees to assist with their reasoning and to choose the appropriate actions were more often correct in their diagnosis than those nurse practitioners who did not use the technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Greenwood (1993) observes that the reality of patient care is made up of ‘messy, intermediate situations’ where the best outcomes may be dependent upon opinion, and the ranking of hypotheses may be difficult as well as being meaningless. On the other hand, Grier (1976) and Aspinall (1979) found that nurses using decision trees to assist with their reasoning and to choose the appropriate actions were more often correct in their diagnosis than those nurse practitioners who did not use the technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research in nursing exploring this theory is sparse due to the need for mutually exclusive alternatives and quantitative probability estimates [5]. An early study [2] demonstrated that data structured in the form of algorithms or decision trees increased the likelihood of finding the correct diagnosis. A recent study [57] of wound treatment options, found that nurses' intuitive decisions agreed with the decision analytic model 35% of the time.…”
Section: Clinical Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of expert nurses to recognize that a significant patient problem existed before any noticeable change in objective vital parameters was used as a basis to study unconscious expert thinking. Although there is research literature on clinical judgment, decision‐making theory ( Hammond, 1955; Hammond et al , 1966a , 1966b; Hammond et al , 1967 ; Aspinall, 1979; Broderick & Ammentorp, 1979; Putzier et al 1985 ; Corcoran, 1986; Tanner et al , 1987 ; Itano, 1989; Fonteyn & Grobe, 1994; Raines, 1996) and intuition in nursing ( Pyles & Stern, 1983; Benner & Tanner, 1987; Young, 1987; Rew, 1988; Crandall & Getchell‐Reiter, 1993; Farrington, 1993; Kenny, 1994; Minick, 1995) little is known about the action‐oriented practice of how nurses think when solving such puzzling and ambiguous problems of practice. A major problem in studying this phenomenon is the unconscious nature of the thought process.…”
Section: Studies On Expert Thinking In Nursing Practicementioning
confidence: 99%