2017
DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of a clinical‐laboratory score to guide treatment of gestational diabetes

Abstract: Objective: To assess the outcomes of implementing a clinical-laboratory score in the treatment of pregnant women with gestational diabetes. Methods:A retrospective before-and-after implementation analysis was undertaken using data and neonatal outcomes for pregnant women with gestational diabetes treated before (January 2011-December 2012; control group) and after (January 2013-December 2014; score group) introduction of a newly developed score. To evaluate the effects of score adoption, odds ratios with 95% c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scores below 0 (zero) indicate the need for a new consultation with a nutritionist; between 0 and 2, maintenance of diet and exercise; between 2 and 4, introduction of oral antihyperglycemic; and, when greater than 4, administration of insulin added to the oral drug. 18 All data were collected at the time of the study from the EPR. The maternal variables analyzed were: age, parity, pregestational BMI, weight gain during pregnancy, diagnostic gestational age (GA), preeclampsia, presence of systemic arterial hypertension (SAH) prior to gestation, 75-gram oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), controlled glycemic index during prenatal care, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and delivery route.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Scores below 0 (zero) indicate the need for a new consultation with a nutritionist; between 0 and 2, maintenance of diet and exercise; between 2 and 4, introduction of oral antihyperglycemic; and, when greater than 4, administration of insulin added to the oral drug. 18 All data were collected at the time of the study from the EPR. The maternal variables analyzed were: age, parity, pregestational BMI, weight gain during pregnancy, diagnostic gestational age (GA), preeclampsia, presence of systemic arterial hypertension (SAH) prior to gestation, 75-gram oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), controlled glycemic index during prenatal care, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and delivery route.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scores below 0 (zero) indicate the need for a new consultation with a nutritionist; between 0 and 2, maintenance of diet and exercise; between 2 and 4, introduction of oral antihyperglycemic; and, when greater than 4, administration of insulin added to the oral drug. 18 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…https://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/handle/10183/177209/Poster_54806.pdf?se quence=2. Arterial Hypertension 38 (7,4) Hypertensive Disease of Pregnancy 3 (0,6)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previus abortion 85 (16,5) GA at Diagnosis 26,85 (7,6) Trimester of diagnosis 1st trimester 27 (5,3) 2nd trimester 149 (29,3) 3rd trimester 332 (65,2)…”
Section: Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%