2015
DOI: 10.1111/tmi.12590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of a bibliometric literature review to assess medical research capacity in post‐conflict and developing countries: Somaliland 1991–2013

Abstract: Abstractobjectives Effective healthcare systems require high-quality research to guide evidence-based interventions and strategic planning. In low-and middle-income countries, especially those emerging from violent conflict, research capacity often lags behind other aspects of health system development.Here, we sought to bibliometrically review health-related research output in Somaliland, a postconflict self-declared, autonomous nation on the Horn of Africa, as a means of assessing research capacity.methods W… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our assessment of collaboration using standard country address methods, we noted that apparent collaboration may not be due to coauthors from different countries, but rather due to dual affiliation of a single author in two AL countries. While our analysis of impact by number of collaborations was inconclusive due to the small number of papers, it has been observed that papers involving more collaborators tend to be more impactful [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our assessment of collaboration using standard country address methods, we noted that apparent collaboration may not be due to coauthors from different countries, but rather due to dual affiliation of a single author in two AL countries. While our analysis of impact by number of collaborations was inconclusive due to the small number of papers, it has been observed that papers involving more collaborators tend to be more impactful [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…between researchers and communities [44] Low research output from researchers from LMIC [45] Community engagement to facilitate a clinical trial [46] Ethical entry" and compliance with local cultural norms [21] Utilizing gatekeepers may augment hierarchies of power [22] Will local populations benefit from the research? [21,30,41,42,46,48] Community engagement enhances cultural understanding, which can help reduce harm amongst participants [22,43,44,46,48] Engagement with local authorities may be necessary, though it has potential unintended consequences on local power dynamics and perceived legitimacy of the researchers [47,50] Limited capacity of locals to conduct their own research [21,33,45,47,49] Tensions:…”
Section: Ethical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concern around the extraction of knowledge from disaster stricken areas [57] Data sharing as ethical imperative [45] Data ownership as it relates to who benefits from research [45,57] Tensions:…”
Section: Child Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most frequent document type was article (203), accounting for 91.03% of the total publications. Reviews (12) ranked the second with a proportion of 5.38%. Chapters in books (3) ranked the third with a proportion of 1.35%.…”
Section: The Current Status Of Studymentioning
confidence: 99%