Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2012.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use and functioning of the affected limb in children with unilateral congenital below-elbow deficiency during infancy and preschool age: A longitudinal observational multiple case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
21
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This helped them reinforce their self-esteem and improve their self-identity. In addition, if prostheses are seen as having no functional gain [8], [13], [46], as being technically unsatisfactory and physically uncomfortable [47]–[49], and sometimes actually hampering effective performance [8] – issues we also found in the present research – the added value of the prosthesis disappears and rejection of it occurs. Interestingly, some of the participants succeeded in embracing acceptance and in using the prosthesis for some daily-life activities and in playing sports, a phenomenon also described in the literature [7], [12].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This helped them reinforce their self-esteem and improve their self-identity. In addition, if prostheses are seen as having no functional gain [8], [13], [46], as being technically unsatisfactory and physically uncomfortable [47]–[49], and sometimes actually hampering effective performance [8] – issues we also found in the present research – the added value of the prosthesis disappears and rejection of it occurs. Interestingly, some of the participants succeeded in embracing acceptance and in using the prosthesis for some daily-life activities and in playing sports, a phenomenon also described in the literature [7], [12].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…It is doubtful that prostheses fulfill these aims, since the rejection rate is high 35–45% [5], while no difference in functionality is seen between prostheses wearers and non-wearers [6], [7]. Furthermore, prosthesis use seems to reduce manipulation, exploration, variation, and adaptation in the daily-life activities of young children with unilateral congenital below-elbow deficiency (UCBED) [8]. By developing compensatory strategies and auxiliary movements using other body parts (e.g., head, legs, and trunk) to perform a task [9], children also tend to be more independent without prostheses [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only stereognosis, but also kinaesthesia, can be affected in children with cerebral palsy (28) and developmental coordination disorders (29,30). A recent study demonstrated a relationship between minor neurological dysfunction and ULRD (14). However, we did not find differences in kinaesthesia between the affected and unaffected sides in URLD, confirming previous results (10).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Children with a neurological motor disorder were found to have poorer stereognosis than healthy children (13). Because minor neurological disorders have been associated with ULRD (14), it is interesting also to investigate stereognosis in these children. Stereognosis has not yet been investigated in ULRD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In children who are cognitively impaired or otherwise unable to understand survey items, validated parent-proxy reports are available, and many studies record only parent-reported outcomes data. However, discrepancies between child-and parentreported outcomes have been noted in previous studies with parents either overestimating or underestimating the impact of CHD on their children [2,3,8,10,40,44,55]. One possible way to evaluate the reliability of a proxy report is to administer the exact same PROM in a parallel fashion to both the parental proxy and the child.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%