SAE Technical Paper Series 2002
DOI: 10.4271/2002-01-2820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

USCAR Traction Test Methodology for Traction-CVT Fluids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 7 shows the measurable contact forces F c and peripheral velocities U with the two-roller traction tester. For comparison, the measurable ranges of the conventional traction testers described in References [1,2] are also shown in the figure. In this figure, Q (= μ max F c U) represents the maximum transmitting power calculated assuming that the value of μ max is 0.1.…”
Section: Configuration Of the Traction Testermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 7 shows the measurable contact forces F c and peripheral velocities U with the two-roller traction tester. For comparison, the measurable ranges of the conventional traction testers described in References [1,2] are also shown in the figure. In this figure, Q (= μ max F c U) represents the maximum transmitting power calculated assuming that the value of μ max is 0.1.…”
Section: Configuration Of the Traction Testermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional traction tester B [2]  The transmittable power : Q =  max UF c  The values of Q is determined assuming that the value of  max is 0.1. The traction curve obtained above becomes asymmetrical about the coordinate origin, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Kwmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By tilting the disk axis in a twin-disk machine, Poon and Haines [5] and Johnson and Robert [6] introduced spin in a rolling/sliding contact, and the forces transmitted in an angular contact bearing and viscoelastic property of lubricants were investigated, respectively. Some other set-ups were also presented to incorporate spinning motion into rolling/ sliding EHL contacts, for example, Robert and Johnson [7] and Newall and Lee [8] employed the disc-ball-disc configuration, and Wedeven et al [9], a tilted ball axis in a ball-on-disc contact. It is revealed that the effective friction coefficient with lubricated spinning is usually larger than that under rolling/sliding conditions, and the spinning motion plays an important role in the power loss in some lubricated components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In gear contacts, mean pressures are typically between 1 and 2 GPa and most research on EHD friction, with one main exception [6], has been made at these pressures. However, there are some machine components, in particular rolling bearings, but also some constant velocity joints [7] and continuously variable transmission components [8] that may operate at significantly higher contact pressures, as indicated in Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%