2010
DOI: 10.3906/elk-0911-277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usage of spline interpolation in catheter-based cardiac mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The basis functions then have the form R i ( x ) := R ( d ( x , x i )), depending only on the distance d ( x , x i ) and usually hyperparameters that control the RBF shape (depending on the choice of basis function). RBFs are used for LAT interpolation by both [ 63 ] and [ 64 ]. Both use ‘polyharmonic splines’, consisting of RBFs with additional polynomial terms, as follows: …”
Section: Global Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The basis functions then have the form R i ( x ) := R ( d ( x , x i )), depending only on the distance d ( x , x i ) and usually hyperparameters that control the RBF shape (depending on the choice of basis function). RBFs are used for LAT interpolation by both [ 63 ] and [ 64 ]. Both use ‘polyharmonic splines’, consisting of RBFs with additional polynomial terms, as follows: …”
Section: Global Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both [ 63 ] and [ 64 ] used Euclidean distances, which cannot account for the manifold, and interpolating conditions, which cannot account for observation error. However, we note the following: (i) to account for the manifold, Euclidean distances can be replaced with geodesic distances and the polynomial term dropped entirely (this term is usually included to improve extrapolation, where CV estimation is undoubtedly very poor); (ii) to account for noisy observations, smoothing interpolation is possible using regularized least squares; in fact the posterior distribution can be easily obtained — see Appendix A .…”
Section: Global Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various interpolation schemes have already been reviewed, along with their effects on EAM. 37,[45][46][47][48] A comparison of current techniques aimed at the reconstruction of activation maps using sparse EAM recordings is shown in Table 2. 44,[49][50][51][52] Conduction Velocity Estimation…”
Section: Interpolation Of Activation Time Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current interpolation methods include cubic spline interpolation [14], radial basis functions [15], Gaussian processes [16], [17], physics-informed neural networks [18], [19], and graph convolutional neural networks [20]. Of these, [14] and [15] do not interpolate on the manifold surface, while [16] and [17] assume a smooth Gaussian prior on a transformation of the data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need for re-examination of interpolation methods for LAT mapping has already been noted in the literature [ 12 ], [ 13 ], but presently only a few groups have attempted to address it. Current interpolation methods include cubic spline interpolation [ 14 ], radial basis functions [ 15 ], Gaussian processes [ 16 ], [ 17 ], physics-informed neural networks [ 18 ], [ 19 ], and graph convolutional neural networks [ 20 ]. Of these, [ 14 ] and [ 15 ] do not interpolate on the manifold surface, while [ 16 ] and [ 17 ] assume a smooth Gaussian prior on a transformation of the data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%