2018
DOI: 10.1097/cin.0000000000000422
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usage and Usability of a Web-based Program for Family Caregivers of Older People in Three European Countries

Abstract: InformCare is a European Web platform that supports informal caregivers of older people by providing access to online information and professional and peer support. The aim of this study was to assess the usage and usability of a psychosocial Web-based program carried out in three European countries (Italy, Sweden, and Germany). A mixed-methods sequential explanatory design was adopted, comprising baseline and postintervention assessments, as well as combined thematic content analysis of results and focus grou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We completed 44 quality assessments on the 42 included studies; two studies [ 34 , 35 ] with mixed-methods design each had 2 quality assessments done. Details of the methodological quality assessments of all 42 studies are in Additional file 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We completed 44 quality assessments on the 42 included studies; two studies [ 34 , 35 ] with mixed-methods design each had 2 quality assessments done. Details of the methodological quality assessments of all 42 studies are in Additional file 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of the methodological quality assessments of all 42 studies are in Additional file 2 . From the 42 papers, 21 (50%) studies were rated as strong [ 17 , 36 55 ], 15 (36%) were rated as moderate [ 24 – 26 , 35 , 56 66 ], and 6 (14%) were rated as low [ 34 , 67 – 71 ]. Most of the included studies used data collection tools with high reliability and validity, and differences in the quality assessment arose mainly from sample representativeness, drop-out rates, integrity of intervention, and appropriateness of the analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations