Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Interaction Design and Children: Building a Community 2004
DOI: 10.1145/1017833.1017839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usability testing with young children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…O teste com o público semelhante recorreu ao método Cognitive Walk-Through (Wharton, Bradford, Jeffries, & Franzke, 1992), com o utilizador percorrendo o protótipo e realizando uma aprendizagem exploratória. Simultaneamente, foi usado a técnica Talk Aloud (Donker & Reitsma, 2004), durante o qual o utilizador dialoga com quem conduz o teste. No final, estes sujeitos preencheram um questionário de satisfação SUS -System Usability Scale (Brooke, 1986).…”
Section: Método E Técnicas De Recolha De Dadosunclassified
“…O teste com o público semelhante recorreu ao método Cognitive Walk-Through (Wharton, Bradford, Jeffries, & Franzke, 1992), com o utilizador percorrendo o protótipo e realizando uma aprendizagem exploratória. Simultaneamente, foi usado a técnica Talk Aloud (Donker & Reitsma, 2004), durante o qual o utilizador dialoga com quem conduz o teste. No final, estes sujeitos preencheram um questionário de satisfação SUS -System Usability Scale (Brooke, 1986).…”
Section: Método E Técnicas De Recolha De Dadosunclassified
“…However when conducting usability research with children there are a number of challenges that need to be considered. In one study [39] out of 70 children only 28 of them made verbal remarks during the user test. This may well be attributed to their personality, a study showed that personality characteristics influences the number of identified problems [40], therefore further research is still required to understand usability methods and their limitations and to ascertain which are applicable to children.…”
Section: Children Evaluating Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many traditional adult evaluation methods are ineffective when used with children [39] and so adaptations to evaluation methods are necessary. The behavior of the evaluator may affect the children's performance, as might other factors, including the decoration of the room and the observational equipment being deployed [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children have acted as design partners [10], participated in usability studies [7,19] and workshops [12,16,23] and have provided feedback on the use of design probes [21,26]. Participation in such activities is an opportunity for researchers who get to collect direct qualitative feedback from their target user group [11] and for children to learn, be creative, and inform the design of future educational products that are both effective and fun to use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%