2016 4th International Conference on User Science and Engineering (I-USEr) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/iuser.2016.7857935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usability testing of e-learning system: A case study on CeL in TARUC, Johor Branch Campus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on this research, usability is one intersection of HCI which directly deals with the user satisfaction. A usability testing done by Satam et al (2016) revealed that layout, color, font and buttons of the e-learning materials are some of the elements to assess the usability of that interface. The ambiguity of these elements and the isolation of the learner will make the interaction between student-student, studentinstructor and student-content confusing, leading to raised dissatisfaction subsequently result to dropping out of the e-learning program (Samarraie et al, 2016;Sorgenfrei and Smolnik, 2016;Kurucay and Inan, 2017;Hong et al, 2017;Premlatha and Geetha, 2015;Ping, 2011;Jou et al, 2016;Kapenieks, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this research, usability is one intersection of HCI which directly deals with the user satisfaction. A usability testing done by Satam et al (2016) revealed that layout, color, font and buttons of the e-learning materials are some of the elements to assess the usability of that interface. The ambiguity of these elements and the isolation of the learner will make the interaction between student-student, studentinstructor and student-content confusing, leading to raised dissatisfaction subsequently result to dropping out of the e-learning program (Samarraie et al, 2016;Sorgenfrei and Smolnik, 2016;Kurucay and Inan, 2017;Hong et al, 2017;Premlatha and Geetha, 2015;Ping, 2011;Jou et al, 2016;Kapenieks, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%