Usability of electronic health record systems in UK EDs

Abstract

BackgroundThe large volume of patients, rapid staff turnover and high work pressure mean that the usability of all systems within the ED is important. The transition to electronic health records (EHRs) has brought many benefits to emergency care but imposes a significant burden on staff to enter data. Poor usability has a direct consequence and opportunity cost in staff time and resources that could otherwise be employed in patient care. This research measures the usability of EHR systems in UK EDs using a validated assessment tool.MethodsThis was a survey completed by members and fellows of the Royal College of Emergency Medicine conducted during summer 2019. The primary outcome was the System Usability Scale Score, which ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Scores were compared with an internationally recognised measure of acceptable usability of 68. Results were analysed by EHR system, country, healthcare organisation and physician grade. Only EHR systems with at least 20 responses were analysed.ResultsThere were 1663 responses from a total population of 8794 (19%) representing 192 healthcare organisations (mainly UK NHS), and 25 EHR systems. Fifteen EHR systems had at least 20 responses and were included in the analysis. No EHR system achieved a median usability score that met the industry standard of acceptable usability.The median usability score was 53 (IQR 35–68). Individual EHR systems’ scores ranged from 35 (IQR 26–53) to 65 (IQR 44–80).ConclusionIn this survey, no UK ED EHR system met the internationally validated standard of acceptable usability for information technology.

Usability of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Recommender System: A Pilot Study

“…These results concur with the other studies which have shown that clinical decision support system usability quality was good [10][11][12]. In contrast to some reports in the literature, there was usability quality of clinical information systems was low [7,13]. This study indirectly implies that end-user involvement in the design of clinical decision support systems and homegrown clinical information systems improves the success and adoption rate of these systems.…”

Implementation of a Real-Time Medication Intake Monitoring Technology Intervention in Community Pharmacy Settings: A Mixed-Method Pilot Study

“…The tool has been used to assess the usability of, cell phones, appliances such as TV and microwaves and websites [42]. Recently, SUS has been utilized in healthcare to evaluate the usability of internet-based healthcare interventions used by professionals, electronic health records, home healthcare devices, mobile health applications, and electronic medication adherence products [43][44][45][46][47].…”

Data saves lives

“…Finally, we must remember that the infrastructure for creating, storing, processing, and transmitting health and care data, while sometimes invisible, has environmental and human costs 19. Just as extracting the raw materials for technology manufacture requires miners to work in unpleasant and sometimes unsafe conditions, the production of healthcare data is often associated with clinician burnout20 and cognitive overload21 related to poor system design22 and usability 23…”