2015
DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2015.1006343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usability of a Low-Cost Head Tracking Computer Access Method following Stroke

Abstract: Assistive technology devices for computer access can facilitate social reintegration and promote independence for people who have had a stroke. This work describes the exploration of the usefulness and acceptability of a new computer access device called the Nouse™ (Nose-as-mouse). The device uses standard webcam and video recognition algorithms to map the movement of the user's nose to a computer cursor, thereby allowing hands-free computer operation. Ten participants receiving in- or outpatient stroke rehabi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data collection methods which have been implemented in the testing of novel assistive technologies include user satisfaction questionnaires [ 35 , 36 ], task completion [ 25 , 26 ], task duration [ 25 ] and comparison between different devices [ 23 ]. Recurrent usability issues include difficulty donning and doffing [ 32 , 33 ], failure to complete tasks [ 37 ] and difficulty accessing emergency stop function [ 26 , 33 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data collection methods which have been implemented in the testing of novel assistive technologies include user satisfaction questionnaires [ 35 , 36 ], task completion [ 25 , 26 ], task duration [ 25 ] and comparison between different devices [ 23 ]. Recurrent usability issues include difficulty donning and doffing [ 32 , 33 ], failure to complete tasks [ 37 ] and difficulty accessing emergency stop function [ 26 , 33 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occupational therapists and direct care professionals use devices of this kind for various reasons: (1) the high cost of some customized AT, which can be reproduced at a lower cost; (2) the absence of AT that meets the user's needs and preferences on the market; (3) the need to adapt an existing form of AT to make it suitable for the user. The scientific literature contains studies on low-cost AT, such as AT for mobility [18][19][20][21], AT for computer access [22,23], AT for educational activities [24], audio prescription [25], AT for blind people, e.g., creating graphics [26], wheelchair accessories [27], gloves for hand therapy [28], and, in recent years, 3D printers for making prostheses [29,30] and orthoses [31], which are increasingly widely used. The do-it-yourself movement has also influenced disabled people and their relatives to make their own low-cost AT [32,33] and users gather to share ideas at events such as the low-cost gatherings in Spain [34] or on websites like Thingiverse [35] or even Pinterest [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter is usually applied in a smaller sample but provides personal thoughts from an insider’s perspective [ 18 ]. To date, most studies used questionnaires to assess users’ satisfaction with the intervention or product being tested [ 19 - 22 ]. Currently, there is a lack of evidence from studies examining the users’ perspective via application of qualitative methodologies [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%