Usability Elements in Digital Textbook Development: A Systematic Review

Sulaiman, Wan Noor Azhar Wan; Mustafa, Siti Ezaleila

doi:10.1007/s12109-019-09675-3

Cited by 14 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 76 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…To identify the relevant research documents, we searched the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases for articles that include the following keywords in the title, abstract and keywords: (''Malaysia Ã '') AND (''govern Ã '' OR ''director Ã '' OR ''board Ã ''). These databases were chosen as they provide a comprehensive list of published documents from different disciplines and include citation counts, which is important information for quality assessment (Cruz-Gonz alez et al, 2021;Linnenluecke et al, 2020;Wan Sulaiman and Mustafa, 2020). In July 2020, the search strings initially hit a sample of 10,141 documents (7,374 papers from Scopus and 2,767 articles from WoS).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The development of corporate governance literature in Malaysia: a systematic literature review and research agenda

Khatib

Elamer

Abdullah

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of the existing literature on corporate governance (CG) aspects of the Malaysian market. It offers insights into the phases of Malaysian CG, identifies crucial gaps in the literature and outlines an agenda for impending research. Design/methodology/approach Following a systematic literature review approach, a final sample of 125 studies from Scopus and Web of Science databases was used in this study. These studies were selected based on quality assessment criteria. Then, the sample literature was evaluated in terms of journals, methodology, theories, modelling, research outcomes and CG characteristics. Findings The results show that there is a growing interest among researchers to further explore CG aspects in Malaysia due to the continuous development of the Malaysian CG codes. Likewise, the review reveals that the majority of prior studies are quantitative and were carried out using archived data from non-financial firms. Also, the existing literature has primarily focused on the outcomes of CG, especially firm performance. Research limitations/implications Overall, the results show that there is ample room for future research. The present paper identifies a number of methodological problems and concerns, and discusses the implications of these problems, while also providing recommendations for future research. The main caveat is that the authors use scholarly papers published in academic journals only, but this approach offers them with opportunities for considerable further developments. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study contributes to the literature by being the first of its kind to concentrate on the Malaysian context. It provides a comprehensive knowledge assessment of the Malaysian CG research and offers advice regarding improvements in research, policy and practice by identifying possible knowledge gaps. Consequently, this study provides a cohesive story of the past and a road map for future research on Malaysian CG.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The development of corporate governance literature in Malaysia: a systematic literature review and research agenda

Khatib

Elamer

Abdullah

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We searched for all published documents on board diversity of financial institutions. To provide a comprehensive systematic review of the literature, we follow the SLR methodology of Amrutha and Geetha (2020), Cruz‐González, Rodríguez, and Segovia (2020), and Sulaiman and Mustafa (2020) and rely on Scopus and Web of Science databases to search the following keywords: “board diversity,” “board composition,” “Female director*,” “gender diversity,” “women director*,” “board tenure,” “education* diversity,” “ethnic diversity,” “national* diversity,” “cognitive diversity,” “demographic* diversity,” “bank*,” and “financial institution*.” The board diversity keywords were identified after reviewing the similar publication and definitions of board diversity (i.e., Baker et al, 2020; Galbreath, 2017; Kagzi & Guha, 2018; Khatib et al, 2020; Tingbani et al, 2020). Boardroom diversity is the heterogeneity among the members of boards in terms of age, gender, ethnicity, nationality, education, and experience.…”

Section: Slr Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Then, this number was reduced by 27articles during the full text assessment, and the final sample literature was 91 studies that explicitly address board diversity topic of financial companies. This method was adopted from other SLR studies in order to identify all publications included in our study (e.g., Li, Terjesen, & Umans, 2020; Sulaiman & Mustafa, 2020). Figure 2 shows the exclusion and inclusion criteria used in searching the literature on Web of Science and Scopus.…”

Section: Slr Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Nudging toward diversity in the boardroom: A systematic literature review of board diversity of financial institutions

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Going beyond the mere gender diversity in the boardroom, this systematic review comprehensively covers the research on board diversity of financial institutions. More specifically, we cover gender diversity, as well as other characteristics of diversity, such as nationality, age, tenure, experience, education, ethnicity, and religion. A systematic literature review was employed using Scopus and Web of Science databases, covering all publications until May 2020, which resulted in 91 studies from 66 top‐ranked journals in accounting, finance, and economic fields. We analyze them based on the journal, methodology, research construct questions, and theoretical perspectives. Our results highlight the substantial knowledge gaps and the inconsistent findings of prior studies on several aspects of the field, suggesting avenues for further studies in terms of research designs, settings, scope, and theories. We argue that there is a need to explore other board diversity attributes rather than focusing on the gender diversity of the boards of financial institutions to achieve sustainable development. Also, more work is outlined on topics related to board diversity of financial firms that receive limited attention from scholars, such as (but not limited to) environmental performance, capital structure, intellectual capital, innovation and earnings quality of financial institutions, as well as the indirect effect of policy settings.

show abstract

“…Furthermore, attractiveness is renamed UI aesthetic in ISO/IEC 25010:2011 (Quality Requirements and Evaluation of Software Products) and as used in [7] study. Therefore, it will also be omitted.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…An e-book is a book in digital support displayed on a desktop, notebook, mobile device, or dedicated device, but this de nition puts out its most noticeable feature: interactivity [6]. Whereby e-books typically have in-use features such as search, annotations, and interactive tools, which will continue to improve [7]. E-books have become more popular in recent years, and they now have a greater share of the e-publishing market [8,9].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Usability Evaluation Factors for Measuring an Accessible Mobile E-Book Applications for Visually Impaired

Matraf

Hashim

Hussain

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The emergence of e-books opens new opportunities for the visually impaired to overcome reading struggling. However, current mobile e-book applications are still not reaching their satisfactory level because of the limitations of mobile devices and lack of understanding of visually impaired needs among mobile application developers. Besides, important factors involve in usability evaluation studies for these applications are still unclear. Therefore, this study aims to develop a usability evaluation model to evaluate an accessible mobile e-book application for the visually impaired. Hence, the study conducted a literature review to identify the usability factors. Secondly, identify the factors that are most frequently used. The authors summarised the identified factors to develop the most important factors relevant to e-book applications for the visually impaired. Thirdly, these factors were then verified by eleven experts. In total, 36 factors were identified from the first phase. The study proposed only five factors: efficiency, effectiveness, satisfaction, learnability, and visual impaired accessibility after applying the summarization and simplifying methods. The results from the expert review shows that all experts agreed with the proposed factors as all the factors get a high average of at least four out of five. These identified factors are vitally important elements to be considered by mobile e-book developers and designers in evaluating whether their mobile e-book applications are usable and accessible to the visually impaired. Consequently, the visually impaired users of mobile e-book application will have the same chance as sighted to benefits from e-book applications.

show abstract

Usability Elements in Digital Textbook Development: A Systematic Review

Cited by 14 publications

References 76 publications

The development of corporate governance literature in Malaysia: a systematic literature review and research agenda

The development of corporate governance literature in Malaysia: a systematic literature review and research agenda

Nudging toward diversity in the boardroom: A systematic literature review of board diversity of financial institutions

Usability Evaluation Factors for Measuring an Accessible Mobile E-Book Applications for Visually Impaired

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About