2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0164-1212(02)00142-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usability-based caching of query results in OLAP systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the heuristic algorithms update the cache with regards to user data [6], storage of important user queries in a cache [7], storage of the cached data on multiple servers [8]. This paper solves the problem of the best use of a cache for execution of the user's queries.…”
Section: Existing Solutions Overview and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the heuristic algorithms update the cache with regards to user data [6], storage of important user queries in a cache [7], storage of the cached data on multiple servers [8]. This paper solves the problem of the best use of a cache for execution of the user's queries.…”
Section: Existing Solutions Overview and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A commonly used approach to process the OLAP queries efficiently is to exploit materialized views (MVs), i.e. the results of pre‐selected or previously issued queries are stored in DWs (Park et al , 2003). However, there is a trade‐off between response times and the storage requirements of pre‐aggregated data.…”
Section: Lessons Learned From Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, pro-active proposals, with cache prefetching or restructuring (with dynamic recalculation of future needed subcubes) are two possible ways for finding solutions in this proposals class (Belo, 2000;Sapia, 2000). Moreover, the subsumption of future appraisal of subcubes (or fragments) in the admission and substitution cache politics is proposed in (Park, Kim, and Lee, 2003), being classified as pro-active proposals too. To completely characterize them we need an extra dimension that shows whose method is used to gain insight into the future.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%