2020
DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2020.578281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usability and Acceptance of an Interactive Tablet-Based Exercise Application: A Mixed Methods Study

Abstract: Purpose: To investigate usability and acceptance of a newly developed interactive, tablet-based exercise application (app) and to explore personal opinions of therapists when using this app in the clinical setting.Methods: Twenty participants (10 therapists and 10 inactive healthy adults) tested usability of this app performing different test tasks, using the think aloud method, and rated overall satisfaction with the System Usability Scale and acceptance with a modified Technology Acceptance Model Questionnai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall acceptance ratings based on the UTAUT were high among both OAs and HPs. These findings align with those of Baschung Pfister et al [57], who investigated the acceptance of an interactive tablet-based exercise application sharing many characteristics with the COCARE system and obtained comparable results. Despite using the TAM as a measure for acceptance and having slightly younger participants (mean age of 57, SD 10 y), their findings support the assumption that remotely managed training using ICTs is generally accepted by older patients, as is the use of technologies for exergaming.…”
Section: Acceptancesupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The overall acceptance ratings based on the UTAUT were high among both OAs and HPs. These findings align with those of Baschung Pfister et al [57], who investigated the acceptance of an interactive tablet-based exercise application sharing many characteristics with the COCARE system and obtained comparable results. Despite using the TAM as a measure for acceptance and having slightly younger participants (mean age of 57, SD 10 y), their findings support the assumption that remotely managed training using ICTs is generally accepted by older patients, as is the use of technologies for exergaming.…”
Section: Acceptancesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Looking at other previous studies [57][58][59][60], the latter factor is especially likely to result in a lower SUS score. For instance, Baschung Pfister et al [57] conducted a usability study on an interactive tablet-based exercise application for independent home-based training, which was, similar to the COCARE system, developed by researchers from ETH, University Hospital Zürich, and Dividat AG. Participants in that study were healthy younger adults with a mean age of 38 (SD 9) and OAs with a mean age of 57 (SD 10), and the application indeed obtained higher SUS scores in the younger participants.…”
Section: Overall Usabilitymentioning
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additional information on physical therapists’ perspectives regarding working with mHealth apps to support HBE and the effects of the physical therapist–patient relation on treatment results might lead to more effective treatments in the future. Although explorative research regarding the usability and acceptability of an app to support HBE by physical therapists is available, research involving physical therapists, patients, and their interactions when using smartphone apps to support HBE is still lacking and should be further investigated [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%