Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2019 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Information System (ICIMCIS) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icimcis48181.2019.8985225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usability Analysis using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) Method for Online Fish Auction Application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Principal Components factor Analysis (PCA) with Varimax Rotation (Allen, 2017;Brown, 2019) was used to analyze the survey items to determine its reliability and adequacy in measuring the research constructs and objectives. The results of the PCA analysis shows that the survey items where valid and reliable (adequate) for testing the research constructs; with Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy (KMO) = 0.690, Bartlett's Test of Sphericity = 7748.76, and significant value p = 0.000, where Eigenvalue > 1, (Ermatita et al, 2019;Frost, 2021;Goni et al, 2020;Sevincer et al, 2017). It is important to mention that the last question in the survey (Item 37) was a text-based open comment question, "In your opinion, what are the obstacles or challenges to using digital technologies for 27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36 Ranked Likert, Multiple-choice 0.704 3994.27 0.000* teaching-learning in higher education in LATAM?…”
Section: Research Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Principal Components factor Analysis (PCA) with Varimax Rotation (Allen, 2017;Brown, 2019) was used to analyze the survey items to determine its reliability and adequacy in measuring the research constructs and objectives. The results of the PCA analysis shows that the survey items where valid and reliable (adequate) for testing the research constructs; with Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy (KMO) = 0.690, Bartlett's Test of Sphericity = 7748.76, and significant value p = 0.000, where Eigenvalue > 1, (Ermatita et al, 2019;Frost, 2021;Goni et al, 2020;Sevincer et al, 2017). It is important to mention that the last question in the survey (Item 37) was a text-based open comment question, "In your opinion, what are the obstacles or challenges to using digital technologies for 27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36 Ranked Likert, Multiple-choice 0.704 3994.27 0.000* teaching-learning in higher education in LATAM?…”
Section: Research Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Principal Components Factor Analysis (PCA) with Varimax Rotation (Allen,2017;Brown, 2019) was used to analyze the different items in the MOOCs and MFD Survey data to determine its reliability and adequacy in answering the research questions and objectives as reported in Table 1. The results of the PCA analysis (Table 1) shows that the different items we have used for the study were valid and reliable (adequate) for answering the research questions and objectives, with Reliability statistics outlined as follows; Students MFD Survey (KMO = 0.563, Bartlett's Test = 643.53, p = 0.000), Teachers MFD Survey (KMO = 0.565, Bartlett's Test = 369.53, p = 0.000), Coursera (KMO = 0.669, Bartlett's Test = 156,144.76, p = 0.000), edX (KMO = 0.500, Bartlett's Test = 125.22, p = 0.000), where Eigenvalue > 1, KMO = Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy (Ermatita et al, 2019;Frost, 2020;Goni et al, 2020;Sevincer et al, 2017).…”
Section: Research Instrument and Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%