‘Us versus them’: A social identity perspective of internal medicine trainees

Abstract

Introduction Silos and group boundaries in the clinical workplace can result in interprofessional conflict which can be a source of anxiety for doctors in training. The social identity perspective (SIP) incorporates theories of social identity and self-categorisation, and may provide a useful lens to understand the socialisation and identity development of doctors. This study aimed to determine if and how the SIP may provide insight into intergroup relations as experienced by internal medicine (IM) trainees in Scotland. Methods Interprofessional communication workshops hosted as part of an IM boot camp between August 2020 and March 2021 were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Subsequent individual interviews with consenting trainees further explored social identity and intergroup relations. Data analysis employed template analysis and deductive independent coding with the SIP informing the initial coding template and new codes added inductively. Results Seventeen workshops, involving 100 trainees, and ten subsequent individual interviews were included. Trainees related to the social identity of an IM doctor and to stereotypes within the workplace. They described intergroup tensions resulting from a perception of differing priorities. They experienced outgroup derogation and the impact of role modelling those in their social group during their identity development. Discussion The SIP provides a useful lens to understand the social phenomena at play for IM trainees. It confirms the expectation of conflict between specialties and negative perceptions of outgroups. There is a need to consider the hidden curriculum of socialisation in the workplace during training and the influence of the learning environment on identity development.

Safety on the ground: using critical incident technique to explore the factors influencing medical registrars’ provision of safe care

“…However, healthcare organisations often value standardisation, stability and the control of risk, which must be balanced with the adaptive flexibility that is essential when navigating the complexity intrinsic to healthcare 40 41. Rigidity within teams is promoted by professional silos, hierarchy, externalisation of responsibility or fixation on incidents 42–44. Flexibility in healthcare is commonly considered in the context of the ability of the workforce to adapt to different tasks or roles 41.…”

Commentary: Imagining possibilities for JEDI in research

“…Our previous work applying a social identity perspective sensitized us to the concepts of various social identities interacting, and the invitation to participate in this series prompted us to consider additional JEDI strategies for a sub-analysis. 8 We employed multiple and multidimensional transi-…”

Assertiveness as a tool to prevent and mitigate inter‐physician conflict

“…I-PC contributes to individual physicians' burnout and moral distress, while fostering othering and siloing among specialty groups. [3][4][5][6] If we, as medical educators, leaders and researchers, hope to prevent and mitigate the consequences of I-PC, then we must strive to establish best practices for collegial inter-physician communication. While no single communication strategy will be the solution to I-PC, the mutual respect encouraged through assertive communication may be a critical step to foster change.Inter-physician conflict (I-PC) has become an accepted part of many physicians' professional experience.In their article, Assertiveness in physicians' interpersonal professional encounters: A scoping review, Gutgeld-Dror et al suggest that assertive communication is preferential to passive, passive aggressive and aggressive communication styles while also helping us to unpack the ambiguity around the term "assertive."…”

“…I-PC contributes to individual physicians' burnout and moral distress, while fostering othering and siloing among specialty groups. [3][4][5][6] If we, as medical educators, leaders and researchers, hope to prevent and mitigate the consequences of I-PC, then we must strive to establish best practices for collegial inter-physician communication. While no single communication strategy will be the solution to I-PC, the mutual respect encouraged through assertive communication may be a critical step to foster change.…”

“…But ubiquity does not equate to innocuity. I‐PC contributes to individual physicians' burnout and moral distress, while fostering othering and siloing among specialty groups 3–6 . If we, as medical educators, leaders and researchers, hope to prevent and mitigate the consequences of I‐PC, then we must strive to establish best practices for collegial inter‐physician communication.…”