1989
DOI: 10.2172/6425928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

US-Spain evaluation of the Solar One and CESA-I receiver and storage systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is 50.5% of the energy absorbed by water/steam for the central panel while 24.9% and 24.6% for the right side and the left side panel respectively. The simulation data agree reasonably well with the experimental data of CESA-1 receiver (Baker et al, 1989), which also shows 48% of the energy absorbed by the central panel and 26% by each side one. Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is 50.5% of the energy absorbed by water/steam for the central panel while 24.9% and 24.6% for the right side and the left side panel respectively. The simulation data agree reasonably well with the experimental data of CESA-1 receiver (Baker et al, 1989), which also shows 48% of the energy absorbed by the central panel and 26% by each side one. Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…And the distribution of incident solar flux has a great effect on the temperature distribution inside the receiver. CESA-1 cavity receiver, a demonstration power station in Spain, was introduced by Baker et al (1989). In their report, receiver controls, locations based on analogic measurements, cold and warm receiver start-ups, and transient response to cloud-induced changes were mentioned as the influential elements on the operation of CESA-1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The m is the fluid mass flowrate. 1 h is the enthalpy change. The energy equation for the superheater is:…”
Section: Mathematical Model and Calculation Flowchartmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second is that, some results of Spanish CESA-I tower plant are taken to test the precision of our developed model. The size, shape and coordinates of each heliostat in the heliostat field and the geometry of the cavity-type receiver are input into our model to make a comparison with the published data by the CESA-I plant [17,18]. The final comparative results were published and analyzed in detail in our previous paper [12].…”
Section: Modeling Of Non-central Focal Process Of Heliostatmentioning
confidence: 99%