“…Scholars addressing information and knowledge production related to Fukushima have often avoided media content in favor of studying the practices and discourses of individual institutions, industries, citizen groups, social movements, or governments (Abe, 2013; Visschers and Wallquist, 2013; Weston, 2013). Scholars drawing on content analysis methods to analyze Fukushima discourse have compared media treatment of nuclear power across time (Schmidt et al, 2013) or place (Katchanovski, 2012); other studies have compared media type (Friedman, 2011; Yamamura, 2012) or focused on a small number of overarching discursive frames (Lazic, 2013; Lazic and Kaigo, 2013). This article is unique in its focus on the emergence of science- and knowledge-related media frames, the implications of this process for public engagement in nuclear energy policy, and its comparative approach.…”