2013
DOI: 10.1080/01296612.2013.11689975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

US press coverage of the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident: Frames, sources and news domestication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a very different cultural context, the UK, Doyle (2007) has studied how the British media contributed to the recasting of nuclear energy as a low-carbon energy source. But much of the media studies on nuclear energy are focused on nuclear accidents coverage, with a particular focus on how the crisis situation of a nuclear disaster is conveyed, such as the Three Mile Island (for example, Rubin, 1987), Chernobyl (Gorney, 1992), and Fukushima nuclear accidents (Lazic & Kaigo, 2013;Gómez, Roses & Rivera, 2014). Ho (2016) provides an exhaustive overview of media discourses related to nuclear energy, standing out those in relation to climate change.…”
Section: News Coverage On Nuclear Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a very different cultural context, the UK, Doyle (2007) has studied how the British media contributed to the recasting of nuclear energy as a low-carbon energy source. But much of the media studies on nuclear energy are focused on nuclear accidents coverage, with a particular focus on how the crisis situation of a nuclear disaster is conveyed, such as the Three Mile Island (for example, Rubin, 1987), Chernobyl (Gorney, 1992), and Fukushima nuclear accidents (Lazic & Kaigo, 2013;Gómez, Roses & Rivera, 2014). Ho (2016) provides an exhaustive overview of media discourses related to nuclear energy, standing out those in relation to climate change.…”
Section: News Coverage On Nuclear Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars addressing information and knowledge production related to Fukushima have often avoided media content in favor of studying the practices and discourses of individual institutions, industries, citizen groups, social movements, or governments (Abe, 2013; Visschers and Wallquist, 2013; Weston, 2013). Scholars drawing on content analysis methods to analyze Fukushima discourse have compared media treatment of nuclear power across time (Schmidt et al, 2013) or place (Katchanovski, 2012); other studies have compared media type (Friedman, 2011; Yamamura, 2012) or focused on a small number of overarching discursive frames (Lazic, 2013; Lazic and Kaigo, 2013). This article is unique in its focus on the emergence of science- and knowledge-related media frames, the implications of this process for public engagement in nuclear energy policy, and its comparative approach.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An and Gower (2009) found that over 64% of analyzed news contained conflict frames. For example, U.S. newspapers framed the Fukushima nuclear power plant crisis as a conflict that could induce audience cynicism (Lazic & Kaigo, 2013). Economic consequence frames report a crisis event in terms of the impact the crisis will have economically on individuals, groups, organizations, and nations (An & Gower, 2009;Neuman et al, 1992).…”
Section: Generic Framesmentioning
confidence: 99%