2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2011.00138.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

US Military Aid and Recipient State Cooperation

Abstract: What can states expect to receive in return for the military aid they provide to other states? Can military aid buy recipient state compliance with donor objectives? In this study, we systematically investigate the effects of US military assistance on recipient state behavior toward the United States. We build on existing literature by creating three explicit theoretical models, employing a new measure of cooperation generated from events data, and controlling for preference similarity, so that our results cap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of SEM is in line with the submissions and adoptions by Gyimah-Brempong (1992), Abiola (2003) and Sullivan, Tessman and Li (2011), who noted that the best approach for understanding the interdependencies that exist among variables, which give feedback loops, is to use SEM. This is because single equation overlooks these interdependencies.…”
Section: Hypotheses and Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The use of SEM is in line with the submissions and adoptions by Gyimah-Brempong (1992), Abiola (2003) and Sullivan, Tessman and Li (2011), who noted that the best approach for understanding the interdependencies that exist among variables, which give feedback loops, is to use SEM. This is because single equation overlooks these interdependencies.…”
Section: Hypotheses and Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Another advantage of events data is that it paints a more complete picture of the cooperative behavior of states across a wide range of issue areas and thus allows for more general conclusions. A number of other studies of international cooperation have also relied on events data (for example, Leeds 1999;Colaresi 2004;Pevehouse 2004;Fordham 2005;Sullivan, Tessman and Li 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I am equally not assuming that arms supplying states anticipate civil wars in the future, but that they choose their recipients for varying reasons. See Sullivan et al (2011) and Erickson (2011) for further debate on the selections of arms recipients. 10 See the data provided by SIPRI: http://armstrade.sipri.org/armstrade/page/values.php, retrieved on 04.…”
Section: Conclusion and Implications For Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%