1998
DOI: 10.1016/s1051-0443(98)70277-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

US-guided Puncture of the Internal Jugular Vein: Complications and Anatomic Considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

14
107
0
13

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
14
107
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…In expert hands, the traditional technique is considered safe, but the reliability of anatomic landmarks is questionable because anatomic variations involving this vein and its relation to the internal carotid artery are encountered in a substantial number of cases [33,34]. When landmark-based insertion fails, success rates drop 25 % with each repeat attempt, and the number of attempts is closely correlated with the likelihood of complications [9], the most common of which is arterial puncture [6].…”
Section: Internal Jugular Veinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In expert hands, the traditional technique is considered safe, but the reliability of anatomic landmarks is questionable because anatomic variations involving this vein and its relation to the internal carotid artery are encountered in a substantial number of cases [33,34]. When landmark-based insertion fails, success rates drop 25 % with each repeat attempt, and the number of attempts is closely correlated with the likelihood of complications [9], the most common of which is arterial puncture [6].…”
Section: Internal Jugular Veinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). [6][7][8] The use of ultrasonography in experienced hands reduces the number of attempts and arterial punctures compared with the landmark method. After 3 or more attempts at insertion, mechanical complications increase by 6 times compared with a single attempt.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7 The vast superiority of ultrasound guidance is similarly beyond dispute. 8 At our institution the total cost of a temporary CVC placement in radiology is C$250 with an average total procedure time of 15 min. The professional fee for a surgically placed catheter is comparable but in addition there is the added cost of operating room time, anesthetic fee and a longer total procedure time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, all punctures are performed using real time sonographic visualization of the vein which has been demonstrated to be superior to blind puncture. 8 This is reflected in the high percentage of first pass and single wall punctures. It has been shown that the most important predictor of CVC placement complications is the number of passes required to gain venous access.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%