2007
DOI: 10.1148/rg.27si075502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

US-guided Core Needle Biopsy of Axillary Lymph Nodes in Patients with Breast Cancer: Why and How to Do It

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
60
0
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
60
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Ultrasound features for suspected axillary lymph nodes include asymmetric cortical thickening or lobulations, loss of fatty hilum, abnormal shape (rounded appearance), and increased peripheral flow (89). Ultrasound-guided needle biopsy is simple, relatively easy, minimally invasive, and safe (89).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasound features for suspected axillary lymph nodes include asymmetric cortical thickening or lobulations, loss of fatty hilum, abnormal shape (rounded appearance), and increased peripheral flow (89). Ultrasound-guided needle biopsy is simple, relatively easy, minimally invasive, and safe (89).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the very few studies that used CNB, the sensitivity and specificity were comparable to those of FNA biopsy. [26][27][28] US-guided FNA of the lymph nodes is generally performed by the radiologist using a 22-gauge or 23-gauge hypodermic needle with a 10-mL syringe attached to the needle, with or without the instillation of local anesthetic in and around the lymph node of interest. There are no recommendations for optimal processing of the aspirate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, Takashima et al [3] presents data that suggests that ultrasound is superior to CT and MRI. Complication rates for CT-guided punctures are reported in the range of 0.05% -2.5% [13], which is comparable to complication rates reported for sonographically guided punctures (0% -2.9%) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. A comparison study reported by Sheafor et al [14] also found no significant difference in the rate of complications between CT-and sonographically guided punctures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…No complications were recorded in the present patient collective. In the literature, reported rates are low, ranging from 0 to 2.9% [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] ( Table 1). Major complications were reported in two publications, both secondary to vascular injuries [3,6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%