2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1470-6431.2003.00291.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

US aggregate demand for clothing and shoes: effects of non‐durable expenditures, price and demographic changes

Abstract: The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of the changes in total non‐durables expenditures, prices and US demographics on demand for different clothing categories and shoes in a time‐series framework. The basis for the demand model was the almost ideal demand system model. Demographic variables included in the model were age distribution of US population (median age and variance) and proportion of non‐white population to the total US population. The results indicate that total non‐durable e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
7
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A survey of studies published in 2000 by Cheng indicated U.S. expenditures on clothing are typically inelastic with respect to income. Another survey (Kim, ) noted nearly as many studies finding elasticities above 1 as below. An international cross‐sectional study found a narrow range of income elasticities for clothing expenditures, from 0.93 in Tanzania to 0.90 in the United States (Seale et al., ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A survey of studies published in 2000 by Cheng indicated U.S. expenditures on clothing are typically inelastic with respect to income. Another survey (Kim, ) noted nearly as many studies finding elasticities above 1 as below. An international cross‐sectional study found a narrow range of income elasticities for clothing expenditures, from 0.93 in Tanzania to 0.90 in the United States (Seale et al., ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…MacDonald's () estimates for these same markets ranged from −0.45 to −0.89. Surveys of studies of consumers’ response to clothing price changes have found a wide range of elasticities, with Cheng () citing a range from −0.19 to −1.96, and Kim () citing a range of −0.79 to −1.75. Seale et al () estimated a range from −0.8 in low‐income countries to as high as −0.7 in high‐income countries.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The κ jk parameter also estimates the effects of dummy variables on the expenditure share of each consumption item. The elasticities for the LAIDS model are expressed as follows (Buse, 1994;Kim, 2003;Moschini, 1995):…”
Section: Proposed Demand Model and Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, Fan et al (1996), using an AIDS model, estimated the income elasticity for apparel to be 1.46 and the own price elasticity to be −1.75, suggesting that apparel is a luxury and is very price elastic. Kim (2003) also conducted a study on clothing and shoe demand analysis with the AIDS model. In the result of the study he mentioned that total non-durables expenditure elasticities of women's and children's clothing, men's and boys' clothing and shoes are 1.16, 1.1 and 1.11; the price elasticities of them are −0.74, −0.8 and −0.39 respectively.…”
Section: Studies On Demand Analysis For Clothingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation