1992
DOI: 10.1002/hep.1840160412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ursodeoxycholic acid therapy in cystic fibrosis—associated liver disease: A dose-response study

Abstract: Previous studies from our groups have demonstrated improvements in biochemical markers of liver function when cystic fibrosis patients with associated liver disease were administered oral ursodeoxycholic acid. The magnitude of the response was somewhat less than that found when comparable doses (10 to 15 mg/kg body wt/day) of ursodeoxycholic acid are given to other liver disease patients; this may be explained by the bile acid malabsorption that is characteristic of the disease. For this reason a dose-response… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
64
0
6

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
64
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…UDCA has been shown to increase in the duodenal bile up to an average of 42% of total bile acids, the increase being about 28% when a dose similar to the one in the present study was given. 27 The UDCA fraction in urine varied between 7% and 77%, but the two patients who did not normalize LFT had high levels of UDCA in urine, both in relative (64% and 70%) and absolute concentrations compared with the other patients. Case 7, who was one of the most affected patients regarding liver disease, and did not respond to the treatment, had a high UDCA concentration in urine (18% vs. Ͻ5% in all other patients) at the start of the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…UDCA has been shown to increase in the duodenal bile up to an average of 42% of total bile acids, the increase being about 28% when a dose similar to the one in the present study was given. 27 The UDCA fraction in urine varied between 7% and 77%, but the two patients who did not normalize LFT had high levels of UDCA in urine, both in relative (64% and 70%) and absolute concentrations compared with the other patients. Case 7, who was one of the most affected patients regarding liver disease, and did not respond to the treatment, had a high UDCA concentration in urine (18% vs. Ͻ5% in all other patients) at the start of the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In our study, UDCA and GM1 actions, at the doses used in our experiments, cannot be attributed to direct antioxidant properties of these compounds since they were unable to scavenge superoxide anion and hydroxyl radical in vitro and to inhibit iron-induced lipid peroxidation of rat hepatocytes. This new mechanistic demonstration of a beneficial effect of UDCA is particularly interesting because UDCA is a therapeutically relevant bile acid, already used for preventing human chronic cholestatic liver diseases (Colombo et al, 1992;Poupon et al, 2003) that might be useful in the very early stages of the alcoholic liver diseases as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Al cabo de dos meses de tratamiento con AUDC, la presencia de este ácido biliar representa entre el 25 y el 42% de la reserva, a expensas de los ácidos cólico y quenodesoxicólico; estas diferencias son dependientes de la dosis [9] . A partir de estos estudios se llegó a la conclusión de que la dosificación recomendada de AUDC es de 20 mg/kg/día o mayor [9] .…”
Section: Fibrosis Quísticaunclassified