1997
DOI: 10.1051/jp1:1997171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ursell Operators in Statistical Physics III: Thermodynamic Properties of Degenerate Gases

Abstract: We study in more details the properties of the generalized Beth Uhlenbeck formula obtained in a preceding article. This formula leads to a simple integral expression of the grand potential of any dilute system, where the interaction potential appears only through the matrix elements of the second order Ursell operator U2. Our results remain valid for significant degree of degeneracy of the gas, but not when Bose Einstein (or BCS) condensation is reached, or even too close to this transition point. We apply the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and m the mass of the bosons. We will also replace the value of the diagonal matrix elements of U S 2 by their expression as a function of the (symmetrized) Ursell length a S U (k), which is given in equation ( 17) and ( 4) of [43]:…”
Section: A Mean-field Like Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and m the mass of the bosons. We will also replace the value of the diagonal matrix elements of U S 2 by their expression as a function of the (symmetrized) Ursell length a S U (k), which is given in equation ( 17) and ( 4) of [43]:…”
Section: A Mean-field Like Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usual way to understand this property is to replace the real potential V 12 by a pseudo-potential, which is directly proportional to the scattering length a and treated to first order, a somewhat heuristic method (since the exact reason why using the real potential is incorrect is not so clear). Here, we clearly see that what appears naturally is the matrix elements of U 2 (1, 2); as shown in [19], the latter can be expressed in terms of phase shifts and be shown to be proportional to the scattering length 10 a: for instance, if the latter is positive, we directly get a positive value for the mean-field, without any special manipulation 11 .…”
Section: Physical Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…(for the moment, when l > 2, we do not specify the exact relation between an U l operator and U l , but we will come back to this point later). We note that, here, U 2 is defined symmetrically, with square roots of U 1 operators on each side (U 1 is a positive operator), so that U 2 is Hermitian -this was not the case in [19]. The introduction of U 2 has two advantages.…”
Section: Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Once this point of view is adopted, the difficulty consists in expressing quantities of physical interest in terms of short-time processes. This will be done using the standard tool of cluster expansions [28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%