2006
DOI: 10.1089/end.2006.20.800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urothelial-Cell Carcinoma and Solitary Kidney: Outcomes with Renal-Sparing Management

Abstract: Renal-sparing approaches remain an option in motivated patients with solitary kidneys and UT-TCC. Patients should realize that management tends to involve multiple procedures that are associated with potential morbidity, entails lifetime follow-up, and often requires long-term nephrostomy access for topical treatment or relief of obstruction. Long-term patient quality-of-life and cancer-specific outcomes for renal- sparing management compared with quality-of-life and survival on dialysis are unknown.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[12][13][14][15][16][17] Cancer-specific survival rates ranged from 49.3% to 100% in the selected series. Renal preservation rates ranged from 70% to 80%.…”
Section: Survival Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[12][13][14][15][16][17] Cancer-specific survival rates ranged from 49.3% to 100% in the selected series. Renal preservation rates ranged from 70% to 80%.…”
Section: Survival Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Milner and colleagues reported on the percutaneous management of low-grade tumours in a solitary kidney and concluded that in motivated patients, who would adhere to strict follow-up regimens, this was a viable option. 4 Looking at this from a cost analysis perspective, Pak and colleagues concluded that renal-sparing upper urinary tract TCC management was effective at reducing healthcare expenses related to end-stage renal disease. 4 Our patient was unique in that the tumour was unmanageable endoscopically, but the option of radical nephroureterectomy would render him anephric.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Looking at this from a cost analysis perspective, Pak and colleagues concluded that renal-sparing upper urinary tract TCC management was effective at reducing healthcare expenses related to end-stage renal disease. 4 Our patient was unique in that the tumour was unmanageable endoscopically, but the option of radical nephroureterectomy would render him anephric. Had the tumour been a smaller, non-circumferential lesion, involving the …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrocautery, neodymium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser, and holmium laser are all feasible energy sources, with laser ablation preferred by many contemporary practitioners. The patient should be forewarned that complete eradication of lesions may not be accomplished on the initial intervention and that recurrences are common [7]. While this is an upper-pole lesion, the approach can also be percutaneous, although a concern for tumor along the access tract does exist.…”
Section: Expert Commentary: Dr Malkowiczmentioning
confidence: 99%