1972
DOI: 10.1038/sc.1972.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urological operations for improvement of bladder voiding in paraplegic patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial literature search resulted in 930 abstracts. After reviewing 84 full-text articles, eight studies were included [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Table 1 shows the descriptives of the included studies.…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The initial literature search resulted in 930 abstracts. After reviewing 84 full-text articles, eight studies were included [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Table 1 shows the descriptives of the included studies.…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All study participants were included consecutively. Of the 333 included patients, neurogenic bladder dysfunction was due to SCI in 201 men [11,12,14,16], Parkinson disease in 73 men [10,17], CVA in 53 men [13,15], spina bifida in four men [12], and MS in two men [12].…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Clean, atraumatic intermittent catheterisation has been practised in cases of neurogenic bladder dysfunction (Lapides et at., 1972). Although transurethral resection of bladder neck, Otis urethrotomy and simple repeated urethral dilata tion have been advocated in female paraplegics (Elsaesser & Stoephasius, 1972;Jameson, 1976) some of these procedures could occasionally lead to urinary incon tinence. Pharmacological agents such as phenoxybenzamine have also been used but such pharmacotherapy would first require long-term trials as well as cheap and ready availability in developing countries before an opinion on their role in treatment gets properly defined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%