Urological activity at the time of COVID-19 pandemic: Is there any differences between public and private field?

Abstract

Introduction as COVID-19 pandemic is rapidly evolving, there is a whole reorganization in hospitals to concentrate more resources to face the crisis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 disease on urological activity in Tunisia. To assess the differences in the management of urological conditions between the private and the public field. Methods a survey was addressed to all certified urologists working in Tunisia in both the public and private sectors (n=194) using the national database of active urologists available and updated. We either called them or looked them up through email or social media. The form was open from March the 28 th to April the 3 rd . Results were obtained via spreadsheet and analysed using SPSS 23.0. Results one hundred and twenty urologists have filled in the form. Consultations at the outpatient office were restricted to urgent cases in 66% (n=79). Telemedicine was more used by urologists in private than in public fields p=0.03. Urologists in private sector followed more the sterilization protocol of the hospital/clinic and used more disposable materials whenever possible p=0.011. Elective surgical activity has completely stopped in 85% of the responders (n=102). Elective surgery requiring transfusion or intensive care unit was performed in 38% (n=46) and 26% (n=31) if there was a risk of disease progression. Benign Prostate Hyperplasia (BPH) surgery was more performed as usual in private sector than in public sector p=0.012. It was the only condition managed differently between both sectors. Conclusion the drop of the urological activity is essential in order to give relevant stakeholders room to act efficiently against the spread of the virus. The context of the pandemic and the hospital´s condition must be taken into consideration without compromising the patient´s outcome.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Surgical Training: the Past, the Present and the Future

“…Several factors contributed to this. Elective surgery came to a standstill during the first wave of the pandemic [ 64 – 66 ]. Emergency admissions and emergency surgery were also reduced [ 67 ].…”

“…During the COVID-19 pandemic, outpatient clinics were either cancelled or converted from ‘face-to-face’ to virtual consultations [ 21 , 22 , 30 , 34 , 46 , 55 , 58 , 66 , 79 – 82 ]. This, initially, decreased the exposure of trainees to supervised outpatient clinics, further limiting their training opportunities [ 19 ].…”