2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-008-0584-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urinary tract infections after pelvic floor gynecological surgery: prevalence and effect of antimicrobial prophylaxis. A systematic review

Abstract: We evaluated the prevalence of urinary tract infection (UTI) after pelvic floor operations for non-malignant etiology and the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis. This was made possible by a review of the evidence from relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Nineteen out of 879 initially identified studies met the criteria for inclusion in our review. Four RCTs compared an antibiotic prophylactic regimen with placebo, 11 two different prophylactic antibiotic regimens, and four had three different tre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
16
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The 38% UTI rate in the placebo group was higher than expected and is high compared to the rates reported in the current literature 3. In populations with a lower UTI rate, cranberry may not be as effective.…”
Section: Commentarycontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…The 38% UTI rate in the placebo group was higher than expected and is high compared to the rates reported in the current literature 3. In populations with a lower UTI rate, cranberry may not be as effective.…”
Section: Commentarycontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Prevalence of postoperative urinary tract infection in our group does not differ from other studies, where Ampicilin+Sulbactam was used for antibiotic prophylaxis (Falagas et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…In a recent systematic review, Flagas et al found UTI occurred in 0-15% of patients undergoing pelvic floor gynecological surgery who received cephalosporins as antibiotic prophylaxis. In contrast, the incidence was 10-64% in patients who did not receive antibiotic prophylaxis [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%