2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00740-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urinary tract erosions after synthetic pubovaginal slings: diagnosis and management strategy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
60
2
18

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
60
2
18
Order By: Relevance
“…3,4 Our case differs from other reports in the literature in that there was no tape erosion and the tape had caused a pseudo-tumour of inflammatory tissue to form, which masqueraded as a muscle invasive bladder tumour. These types of pubovaginal slings are no longer used for urinary SUI due to the above-mentioned complications and are no longer commercially available.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…3,4 Our case differs from other reports in the literature in that there was no tape erosion and the tape had caused a pseudo-tumour of inflammatory tissue to form, which masqueraded as a muscle invasive bladder tumour. These types of pubovaginal slings are no longer used for urinary SUI due to the above-mentioned complications and are no longer commercially available.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…23 Relativamente à erosão da fita, as taxas descritas, variam entre 0,3 a 23%. 24 No nosso estudo detectaram-se 2,8% de erosões da mucosa, tendo-se verificado uma maior taxa no grupo submetido à técnica inside-out (oito doentes) e apenas dois casos no grupo outside-in.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…In our study,this rate was 6.94%. The reported extrusion incidence varies from 0.3% to 23% with higher rates when synthetic sling material was used [20]. Several factors contribute to the wide range of extrusion rates, including specific properties of the sling material, local ischemia, poor mesh incorporation, and basic tissue compatibility [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%