2015
DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-14-0210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urinary Protein Biomarkers in the Early Detection of Lung Cancer

Abstract: The early detection of lung cancer has the potential to greatly impact disease burden through the timely identification and treatment of affected individuals at a manageable stage of development. The insufficient specificity demonstrated by currently used screening and diagnostic techniques has led to intense investigation into biomarkers as diagnostic tools. Urine may represent a non-invasive alternative matrix for diagnostic biomarker development. We performed an analysis of 242 biomarkers in urines obtained… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While early detection of small cancerous lesions carries the benefit of wider treatment options and better prognosis of LC patients, the process of obtaining a tissue biopsy to confirm a cancerous tissue is not free of complications and bears incon- veniences and stress to the patient. Despite advances in technology and intensive research efforts, no molecular biomarker capable of identifying LC in the early stages has been found to be suitable for clinical use (Nolen et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2015). Research efforts have been focused on identifying sensitive and specific blood-based biomarkers for early detection of LC, such as: identification of proteins, protein panels or antibodies to tumor-associated antigens; analysis of epigenetic changes such as methylation; microRNA profiling; and gene expression profiling (Tsay et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While early detection of small cancerous lesions carries the benefit of wider treatment options and better prognosis of LC patients, the process of obtaining a tissue biopsy to confirm a cancerous tissue is not free of complications and bears incon- veniences and stress to the patient. Despite advances in technology and intensive research efforts, no molecular biomarker capable of identifying LC in the early stages has been found to be suitable for clinical use (Nolen et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2015). Research efforts have been focused on identifying sensitive and specific blood-based biomarkers for early detection of LC, such as: identification of proteins, protein panels or antibodies to tumor-associated antigens; analysis of epigenetic changes such as methylation; microRNA profiling; and gene expression profiling (Tsay et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) Based on the Food and Drug Administration criteria [24], any screening test directed at a disease with a prevalence of 5% or less must detect preclinical disease with a sensitivity exceeding 95% when the specificity is less than or equal to 95%, and vice versa [24]. The prevalence of lung cancer in high-risk groups is at 1% to 3%, whereas LDCT has about 90% sensitivity and 61% specificity for lung cancer early detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein profiling is another diagnostic method based on liquid biopsy (39). Numerous studies on LC protein biomarkers have been conducted in blood, urine, saliva and exhaled breath condensate (EBC) samples (40)(41)(42). Common protein biomarkers for LC, including CEA and cytokeratin fragment 21-1, are not sensitive enough to detect early tumors (43).…”
Section: Emerging Non-invasive Detection Methods For Lcmentioning
confidence: 99%