2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.06.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urinary Outcomes Are Significantly Affected by Nerve Sparing Quality During Radical Prostatectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
30
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It has also previously been suggested that degree of nerve sparing is associated with improved postprostatectomy functional urinary outcomes immediately after catheter removal, as well as over the first postoperative year. 5,30 In our study, nerve sparing was not associated with improved continence following RARP. Some studies have suggested that BMI, staging and preoperative PSA were predictors of continence at 3 and 12 months; however, our analyses did not demonstrate these variables as predictors of early continence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…It has also previously been suggested that degree of nerve sparing is associated with improved postprostatectomy functional urinary outcomes immediately after catheter removal, as well as over the first postoperative year. 5,30 In our study, nerve sparing was not associated with improved continence following RARP. Some studies have suggested that BMI, staging and preoperative PSA were predictors of continence at 3 and 12 months; however, our analyses did not demonstrate these variables as predictors of early continence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…We know that preservation of these two bundles is of central importance if the patient is to recover his sexual health [3]. We do not know, however, if the degree of preservation of these neurovascular bundles predicts urinary continence [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 This deleterious effect persisted despite controlling for factors known to affect urinary con- Urinary function post rP and penile rehabilitation valescence, including age, nerve-sparing quality/quantity as captured by nerve-sparing score (NSS), and time after surgery. While the effects of better nerve-sparing on improving early urinary outcomes after RP in previously potent men have been suggested in the literature, [10][11][12] it has not been shown that early PDE5i use after RP may adversely affect early urinary health-related quality of life. It is known that PDE5i therapy improves erections during the convalescence from nerve-sparing RP; 13 its effects on penile rehabilitation with daily use after RP are less clear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%