2016
DOI: 10.1002/nau.23160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urinary incontinence, but not fecal incontinence, is a risk factor for admission to aged residential care of older persons in New Zealand

Abstract: UI is a common, independent risk factor for ARC admissions. Identifying the extent of incontinence and its impact on ARC admissions is the first vital step in addressing the burgeoning need for better community continence services.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, other studies reported an absence of interaction between UI and FI on the prediction of institutionalization [22,23]. Discrepancies may stem from methodological differences as we used multivariate analysis while other studies have applied univariate analysis [23,24]. Moreover, the lack of distinction between UI and FI [20] and absence of consensus on the definition of FI may explain different effects of FI on institutionalization [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, other studies reported an absence of interaction between UI and FI on the prediction of institutionalization [22,23]. Discrepancies may stem from methodological differences as we used multivariate analysis while other studies have applied univariate analysis [23,24]. Moreover, the lack of distinction between UI and FI [20] and absence of consensus on the definition of FI may explain different effects of FI on institutionalization [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This observation suggests that as the severity of incontinence increases, so does the risk of NH admission. However, other studies reported an absence of interaction between UI and FI on the prediction of institutionalization [22,23]. Discrepancies may stem from methodological differences as we used multivariate analysis while other studies have applied univariate analysis [23,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…These results have been challenged by a review criticizing methodological quality of studies on a possible association between nursing home admission and toileting difficulties and by questioning the role of incontinence as an independent risk factor for nursing home admission (Holroyd‐Leduc et al, ; Luppa et al, ). A recent study investigated the role of urinary incontinence and faecal incontinence separately and found urinary incontinence, but not faecal incontinence, to be an independent risk factor for nursing home admission (Schluter, Ward, Arnold, Scrase, & Jamieson, ). A Norwegian study on nursing home admission and death using the same study material as used in our study found that lower personal functioning in activities of daily living (ADL) was associated with a higher risk of nursing home admission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those using any collection devices were excluded (ie, response option [1]), as were those with no output (as they are suggestive of intervention such as dialysis or incorrect coding). As suggested and undertaken previously, 21 to reduce potential misclassification an a priori decision was made to collapse these response options into three categories, namely (a) continent; (b) occasionally incontinent (combining response options [2] and [3]); and (c) frequently incontinent (combining response options [4] and [5]). 21 Falls history within the last 90 days was elicited from a single question; namely, participants are asked if they have experienced a fall, with response options: (0) no fall in the last 90 days; (1) no fall in last 30 days, but fell 31 to 90 days ago; (2) one fall in last 30 days; and, (3) two or more falls in last 30 days.…”
Section: Instrument and Primary Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As suggested and undertaken previously, 21 to reduce potential misclassification an a priori decision was made to collapse these response options into three categories, namely (a) continent; (b) occasionally incontinent (combining response options [2] and [3]); and (c) frequently incontinent (combining response options [4] and [5]). 21 Falls history within the last 90 days was elicited from a single question; namely, participants are asked if they have experienced a fall, with response options: (0) no fall in the last 90 days; (1) no fall in last 30 days, but fell 31 to 90 days ago; (2) one fall in last 30 days; and, (3) two or more falls in last 30 days. Using the falls CAP, 22 response options (0) and (1) were combined to defined a "low risk" of falls; (2) defined a "medium risk"; while (3) was used to define "high risk."…”
Section: Instrument and Primary Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%