2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urinary 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2′-deoxyguanosine analysis by an improved ELISA: An inter-laboratory comparison study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MS/MS based on a previous report[15]; the authors demonstrated that purification of urine samples by SPE can improve the correlation between these two methods. However, a recent report from this group showed that ELISA still cannot be considered as a robust alternative to HPLC-MS/MS after an inter-laboratory comparison(18]. Our results indicate that the levels of…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MS/MS based on a previous report[15]; the authors demonstrated that purification of urine samples by SPE can improve the correlation between these two methods. However, a recent report from this group showed that ELISA still cannot be considered as a robust alternative to HPLC-MS/MS after an inter-laboratory comparison(18]. Our results indicate that the levels of…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The analysis of 8-oxodG by ELISA were criticized for its inter-laboratory variability and poor agreement with chromatographic techniques [18]; however, its advantages include the capacity for high-throughput and relatively low in cost [15], that can account for its continued common usage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given these conflicting findings, we believe that readers should pay attention to the following points: First, the nomenclature used is not consistent across authors, and the abbreviations for the same chemical entity differ over time and among authors, which may confuse readers and cause them to draw a different conclusion. Second, various methods have been used to determine the levels of 8-oxodGuo, and historically, the quantitation of urinary 8-oxodGuo in diabetic nephropathy research has mainly been based on HPLC with electrochemical detection (HPLC-ECD) or ELISA [ 5 , 6 , 20 22 ], methods that are hampered by insufficient specificity and sensitivity [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may also be pointed out that the measurement of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2’-deoxyguanosine (8-oxodG) in human fluids including urine, plasma and saliva has been achieved by competitive ELISA using N45.1 monoclonal antibody [110,111]. It was recently confirmed that the immunological detection of 8-oxodG in urine is less quantitative than that achieved by HPLC-ESI-MS/MS due to the presence of interfering contaminants such as D-glucose and D-galactose [112,113]. …”
Section: Measurement Of Oxidatively Generated Damage In Cellular Dnamentioning
confidence: 99%