2020
DOI: 10.1161/circep.120.008722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urgent Pacemaker Implantation Rates in the Veneto Region of Italy After the COVID-19 Outbreak

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

9
32
3
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
9
32
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A reduction up to 50% in urgent pacemaker implants for severe bradyarrhythmias was previously reported, in agreement with our national survey, by analysis performed on a single hospital basis or on a regional basis [14,15]. The reduction in urgent pacemaker implants may imply a lack of prevention for the potential harmful consequences of bradyarrhythmias and, indeed, a relative increase in the proportion of patients presenting with syncope due to bradyarrhythmias was already observed [15]. It is possible that this trend will increase also in the post-lockdown phase and it will be interesting to analyse if it will lead to a rebound in pacemaker implants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A reduction up to 50% in urgent pacemaker implants for severe bradyarrhythmias was previously reported, in agreement with our national survey, by analysis performed on a single hospital basis or on a regional basis [14,15]. The reduction in urgent pacemaker implants may imply a lack of prevention for the potential harmful consequences of bradyarrhythmias and, indeed, a relative increase in the proportion of patients presenting with syncope due to bradyarrhythmias was already observed [15]. It is possible that this trend will increase also in the post-lockdown phase and it will be interesting to analyse if it will lead to a rebound in pacemaker implants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In interpreting these findings, it should be considered that the COVID-19 outbreak markedly changed the pattern of Emergency Departments (EDs) referral in Italy, with figures up to a 50% reduction accesses to hospitals and EDs unrelated to COVID-19 [12,13]. A reduction up to 50% in urgent pacemaker implants for severe bradyarrhythmias was previously reported, in agreement with our national survey, by analysis performed on a single hospital basis or on a regional basis [14,15]. The reduction in urgent pacemaker implants may imply a lack of prevention for the potential harmful consequences of bradyarrhythmias and, indeed, a relative increase in the proportion of patients presenting with syncope due to bradyarrhythmias was already observed [15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…During COVID-19 outbreak, the strict rules adopted by Italian government to contain virus diffusion, the reorganization of the healthcare model, the restructuring of hospital services might be in part responsible for the reduction trend in planned hospitalizations and elective procedures, as observed in our study population. In contrast to previous reports from Northern Italy, 7 , 8 which showed a trend of reduction in hospital admission due to cardiovascular diseases leading to cardiac pacing procedures, our data showed no significant difference in Emergency department (ED) admission rate and a remarkably increase in urgent unplanned hospitalizations for patients in need of CIEDs replacement procedures.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…These findings suggest that the strategy of replacing in-hospital visits with “telecardiology” may be effective in the short-term management of patients. However, multiple studies reported that many Italian patients with acute cardiovascular conditions did not seek urgent medical attention during the COVID-19 outbreak [4] , [5] , [6] and this may partly explain the lower number of ED admissions we observed in 2020 than in 2019. For this reason, we believe that a longer follow-up is needed before drawing definite conclusions on the impact to the health of patients with cardiovascular diseases of the modifications of clinical practice that became necessary after the COVID-19 outbreak.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%