2006
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)01051-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urethral Stents for Detrusor Sphincter Dyssynergia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…31 Often, it is necessary to remove the stent, wire by wire, after resection of overlying U. 32 In spite of it, we have removed permanent stents with minimal complications and no lasting consequences. Most withdrawals are conducted within the first year and are mainly owing to inappropriate implantation or displacement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 Often, it is necessary to remove the stent, wire by wire, after resection of overlying U. 32 In spite of it, we have removed permanent stents with minimal complications and no lasting consequences. Most withdrawals are conducted within the first year and are mainly owing to inappropriate implantation or displacement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These interventions may be accompanied by intermittent catheterization 52 . Urethral stents, consisting in the implantation of a rigid and noncompressible material across the external sphincter to maintain urethral patency, may also be used 59‐61 . However, none of these options are completely effective and may be associated with bothersome side effects, including increased risk of urinary infections.…”
Section: Impact Of Urethral Dysfunction In Lut Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%