2014
DOI: 10.1111/bju.12768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ureteric stents vs percutaneous nephrostomy for initial urinary drainage in children with obstructive anuria and acute renal failure due to ureteric calculi: a prospective, randomised study

Abstract: The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02055430

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ElSheemy and colleagues randomized 90 children ≤12 years with anuria or acute renal failure secondary to bilateral ureteral stones to bilateral ureteral stent placement or bilateral PCN tube placement. 26 While there was significantly more complications in the PCN tube cohort, the authors noted higher rates of failure and mucosal complications in the ureteral stent cohort when the stone size was >2 cm. 26 Therefore larger stones may benefit from PCN tube decompression although additional well designed studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions.…”
Section: Acute Managementmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…ElSheemy and colleagues randomized 90 children ≤12 years with anuria or acute renal failure secondary to bilateral ureteral stones to bilateral ureteral stent placement or bilateral PCN tube placement. 26 While there was significantly more complications in the PCN tube cohort, the authors noted higher rates of failure and mucosal complications in the ureteral stent cohort when the stone size was >2 cm. 26 Therefore larger stones may benefit from PCN tube decompression although additional well designed studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions.…”
Section: Acute Managementmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…17 Elsheemy MS et al, recommended JJ stent over percutaneous nephrostomy in patients of calculus renal failure as it may facilitate subsequent URS and ESWL. 18 But preferred Urinary diversion by JJs stents or percutaneous nephrostomy, is still controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The type of urinary diversion to propose differs from the etiology [10]. For the original stone obstruction, retrograde drainage by the double J probe represents the first line of treatment, achieved in 62.5% of cases in our series, except in cases of purulent retention and if the size of ureteral calculus is> 2 cm, where we used a percutaneous nephrostomy tube [5,10,11]. During the establishment of a ureteral catheter, ureteroscopy with fragmentation of obstructive calculation could be considered [12,13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%