1989
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)41280-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ureteral Stents: Materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A biomaterial is de®ned as any substance, natural or synthetic, used in the treatment of a patient which, at some stage, interfaces with tissue [33]. The earliest trials of using implantable prosthetic devices made from glass, tantalum, or vitallium for ureteral replacement failed, due to distal migration or obstruction.…”
Section: Urological Biomaterials and Biocompatibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A biomaterial is de®ned as any substance, natural or synthetic, used in the treatment of a patient which, at some stage, interfaces with tissue [33]. The earliest trials of using implantable prosthetic devices made from glass, tantalum, or vitallium for ureteral replacement failed, due to distal migration or obstruction.…”
Section: Urological Biomaterials and Biocompatibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biofilms can have a positive impact as well, namely lining the healthy intestine and the female genito-urinary tract. Biofilms have significant implications for clinical pharmacology, particularly related to antibiotic resistance, drug adsorption onto and pealing off devices, and minimum inhibitory concentrations of drugs required for effective therapy (Mardis and Kroeger, 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1988 Mardis and Kroeger observed erosion and bullous edema of the bladder mucosa caused by the lower tip of the stent, which explained the development of macrohematuria and pyuria after ureteral stenting without urinary tract infection. 18 Danilovic et al evaluated the urgent ureteral decompression in patients with ureteral obstruction due to intrinsic and extrinsic pathologies and found that Retrograde double-J stenting failed in 9% (2/22) of intrinsic obstruction and in 52% (13/25) of extrinsic obstruction (p<0.001). 2 Mokhmalji et al evaluated the quality of life of patients undergoing diversion procedure and showed that retrograde ureteral stenting was more problematic and negatively affects the quality of life more than percutaneous nephrostomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%