2016
DOI: 10.1111/vsu.12476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ureteral Papilla Implantation as a Technique for Neoureterocystostomy in Cats Undergoing Renal Transplantation: 30 Cases

Abstract: Ureteral papilla implantation is a viable technique for neoureterocystostomy in cats undergoing kidney transplantation. Proposed benefits for the recipient include a less technically challenging anastomosis, decreased risk of ureteral obstruction at the anastomosis site, and reduced risk of leakage compared to previous reports. Benefits for recipients should be weighed against risks to donors, including a more complex ureteral harvest, increased surgical time, and potential injury or obstruction of the contral… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The renal transplant procedure was performed as previously described by Sutherland et al 10 The left kidney was removed from the donor cat and immediately flushed with (~20 ml) of cold, buffered sucrose phosphate preservation solution. The kidney was stored in preservation solution (~4°C) for approximately 1–4 h prior to implantation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The renal transplant procedure was performed as previously described by Sutherland et al 10 The left kidney was removed from the donor cat and immediately flushed with (~20 ml) of cold, buffered sucrose phosphate preservation solution. The kidney was stored in preservation solution (~4°C) for approximately 1–4 h prior to implantation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Despite progressive advances in the transplantation technique, technical complications remain an important cause of postoperative morbidity, with overall perioperative mortality ranging from 13% to 29%. [2][3][4] Vascular anastomosis-related complications are an important reason for perioperative morbidity and include hemorrhage, thrombosis, dehiscence, and hind limb neuropraxia. The very small diameter and fragile nature of the renal vessels in cats make vascular anastomosis technically challenging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11] Reports describing the use for arterial anastomosis are less common because of the thickness and muscularity of the arterial walls, which make eversion over the coupler pins challenging. 6,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] To the best of our knowledge, use of a MAC for end-toside (ETS) vascular anastomosis has not been described in cats. The objective of this study was to describe the technique and determine the feasibility of using a MAC for ETS anastomosis of the renal vein to vena cava and renal artery to aorta for feline renal transplantation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations