1970
DOI: 10.1007/bf03041356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uredospore production and sporulation period of Puccinia recondita f. sp. triticina on primary leaves of wheat

Abstract: Uredospore production per day and per sporulation period was measured under near-optimal conditions. Pustule density influenced time and rate of pustule opening, size of pustules, time of maximum sporulation, length of the sporulation period and the time and rate of tissue necrotisation. Within limits total dry weight of spores per leaf per sporulation period was independent of pustule density; it roughly equalled the dry weight of the spore producing leaf. The longest sporulation period observed was 65 days; … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
50
2
7

Year Published

1975
1975
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
10
50
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In bean rust the growth rate of uredosori and spore production were negatively associated with infection density (Yarwood 1961). In wheat leaf rust (Mehta and Zadoks 1970) and barley leaf rust the same was observed (Baart et al 1991). This density depending effect starts as soon as the much energy asking spore production starts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In bean rust the growth rate of uredosori and spore production were negatively associated with infection density (Yarwood 1961). In wheat leaf rust (Mehta and Zadoks 1970) and barley leaf rust the same was observed (Baart et al 1991). This density depending effect starts as soon as the much energy asking spore production starts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…In this study it was the parameter that correlated less well with the other three parameters (Table 4). The LP, IF and CR are important components of quantitative resistance (Mehta and Zadoks 1970;Parlevliet 1975Parlevliet , 1979Parlevliet and Kuiper 1977;Broers 1989a, b;Habtu and Zadoks 1995;Broers 1997). In the seedling stage the differences in LP among cultivars were small.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lesion density was first analyzed as a response variable to estimate potential differences in infection efficiency and then was introduced as a quantitative co-variable in the analysis of latent period, spore production and lesion size, which are potentially density-dependent variables (Mehta and Zadoks 1970;Shaner 1983;Robert et al 2004). In the lesion size analysis, log-transformation of lesion density was needed to linearize the data.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…typica Arth. (Yarwood 1961) and F. recondita tritici (Mehta & Zadoks 1970). The influence of temperature, light, uredinium density, <Jnd pathogen virulence on latent period has been examined, (Cammack 1967;Parlevliet 1975;Melander 1935;Saari & Moore 1962), but much less information is available on their effect on the infectious period (Mehta & Zadoks 1970;Cammack 1961).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Yarwood 1961) and F. recondita tritici (Mehta & Zadoks 1970). The influence of temperature, light, uredinium density, <Jnd pathogen virulence on latent period has been examined, (Cammack 1967;Parlevliet 1975;Melander 1935;Saari & Moore 1962), but much less information is available on their effect on the infectious period (Mehta & Zadoks 1970;Cammack 1961). There are conflicting reports on the effect of temperature on the latent period of Received 5 September 1977 P. hordei (Simkin & Wheeler 1974;Parlevhet 1975), and the effect of temperature and uredinium density on the length of the infectious period has not been studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%