1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2494.1998.00103.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urea supplementation effects on the utilization of low‐quality forage and lamb production in patagonian rangelands

Abstract: The effect of feeding a urea-based supplement for the last 8 weeks of pregnancy was examined on ewes grazing the grass-shrub steppes of NW Patagonia, Argentina. The productivity of ewes and lambs and the utilization rate of the major, less preferred, grass species (Stipa speciosa, 27% cover) was analysed. In a paddockscale experiment, ewes grazed two areas of 450-500 ha from 15 August to 15 February at a stocking rate of 0·5 ewes ha Ϫ1 . From 15 August to 10 October, one group of ewes was given access to a ure… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Urea molasses products/ UMMB has been suggested a versatile supplement for sheep and goat by many earlier researchers (Golluscio et al, 1998;Currier et al, 2004). Since there was no significant difference in the body weights between concentrate supplemented (T 1 ) and UMMB supplemented (T 2 ) groups at the end of the experiment, it can be inferred that UMMB could be successfully used to replace the concentrate feed for sheep.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Body Weightmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Urea molasses products/ UMMB has been suggested a versatile supplement for sheep and goat by many earlier researchers (Golluscio et al, 1998;Currier et al, 2004). Since there was no significant difference in the body weights between concentrate supplemented (T 1 ) and UMMB supplemented (T 2 ) groups at the end of the experiment, it can be inferred that UMMB could be successfully used to replace the concentrate feed for sheep.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Body Weightmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In contrast, S. grandis is characterized by a relatively low nutritive forage value owing to high concentrations of fibre and lignin and thus has low digestibility [39]. Therefore, S. grandis is less-preferentially grazed by sheep compared with L. chinensis [42], [43]. However, it should be taken into account that current-year species sampling was done in July inside exclosures, and therefore any grazing-related effects on species would have been determined by the previous year’s grazing, rather than grazing in the current year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basal perimeter (cm) Height of the vegetative portion (excluding panicles) (cm) Proportion of standing dead biomass in the tussock (dfrac) Defoliation (0, no defoliated; 1, slightly defoliated; 2, intermediately defoliated; and 3, intensely defoliated) (see Golluscio et al, 1998b) ''Vitality'' (0, a dead tussock; 1, low; 2, medium; 3, high vitality; and 4, very high vitality). Such categorical variable represents a qualitative assessment of the potential productivity of the tussock.…”
Section: Field Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%